Re: Not using the dynamic parameter kstack_depth_to_print?

2008-02-12 Thread Rene Herman
On 13-02-08 02:23, Peter Teoh wrote: see the variable even if CONFIG_X86 is taken away. Anyway, in summary, for x86 and some architecture, kstack_depth can be controlled via sysfs, but for others it is hardcoded. not sure why, hardware depedent? Not too much it seems. Not sure why this has

Re: Not using the dynamic parameter kstack_depth_to_print?

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
Thanks Mulyadi and Rene for replying. On 2/12/08, Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12-02-08 05:40, Peter Teoh wrote: Note that this bit is inside an #if defined(CONFIG_X86) block meaning that only the the one(s) below arch/x86 are related: Ah..the above is the KEY...now I know why

Not using the dynamic parameter kstack_depth_to_print?

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
Under /proc/sys/kernel there exists a parameters called kstack_depth_to_print. But I also see that a lot of other files (as listed below) not using this parameter directly from procfs. Am I mistaken in my analysis? ./kernel/sysctl.c: .procname = kstack_depth_to_print,