Hi...
On 2/3/08, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May be I can help to lower down the learning curve on this part a little bit:
Thanks man, I greatly appreciate your help!
>
> 1. what u said, is about correct. What happens is that GCC
> supports a "section" feature - take a look at "s
May be I can help to lower down the learning curve on this part a little bit:
On Feb 3, 2008 10:57 AM, Mulyadi Santosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> On Feb 2, 2008 1:27 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, the comment is correct. I just made a mistake...
> >
> > __initdata(
Hi all...
On Feb 2, 2008 1:27 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, the comment is correct. I just made a mistake...
>
> __initdata(and __devinidata etc..) can't be mixed with const, because
> otherwise
> the compiler will generate .init.data sections both with and without the
> writeable
Peter Teoh wrote:
> Further to my earlier statement that either init.h is wrong, or the source
> codes are not cleanup, my personal guess is that init.h is not correct (this
> line - "Also note, that this data cannot be "const".") This is because
> these __data can be either constant or non-c
Further to my earlier statement that either init.h is wrong, or the source
codes are not cleanup, my personal guess is that init.h is not correct (this
line - "Also note, that this data cannot be "const".") This is because
these __data can be either constant or non-constant, and can also be
o
Thank you very much for your posting.I shall try..but let me comment
further
On Feb 2, 2008 1:33 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sounds like symbol name's conflict? maybe it happens during linking
> > stage..that is a spesific name is assigned to two ELF section. Just a
>
Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Just trying to offer idea...
> On 2/1/08, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was puzzled today, as several of machines all compiled the latest git
>> pulled kernel with the following errors:
>>
>>CHK include/linux/version.h
>>CHK include/l
Hi...
Just trying to offer idea...
On 2/1/08, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was puzzled today, as several of machines all compiled the latest git
> pulled kernel with the following errors:
>
>CHK include/linux/version.h
>CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
>CALLscrip
I was puzzled today, as several of machines all compiled the latest git
pulled kernel with the following errors:
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC [M] drivers/net/sis190.o
drivers/net/si
