On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 18:07 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
> > wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:50 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
> > [...]
> >
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 18:07 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:50 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
> [...]
> > I have came across, this kind of structure initialization for the
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:50 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
> [...]
> > I have came across, this kind of structure initialization for the
> > first time:
> [...]
> > [ICMP_ADDRESSREPLY] = {
> > .output_entry
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:50 +0530, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar wrote:
[...]
> I have came across, this kind of structure initialization for the
> first time:
[...]
> [ICMP_ADDRESSREPLY] = {
> .output_entry = ICMP_MIB_OUTADDRMASKREPS,
> .input_entry = ICMP_MIB_INA
I apologize for last incomplete mail, please ignore it:
I have came across, this kind of structure initialization for the first
time:
static const struct icmp_control icmp_pointers[NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1] = {
[ICMP_ECHOREPLY] = {
.output_entry = ICMP_MIB_OUTECHOREPS,
Hi all,
I have came across, this kind of structure initialization for the first
time.
static const struct icmp_control icmp_pointers[NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1] = {
[ICMP_ECHOREPLY] = {
.output_entry = ICMP_MIB_OUTECHOREPS,
.input_entry = ICMP_MIB_INECHOREPS,
