Re: module state:permanent

2008-12-11 Thread amit mehta
its refernce to the function and that makes it permanent. --Bala -- *From:* amit mehta ami...@gmail.com *To:* Sandeep K Sinha sandeepksi...@gmail.com *Cc:* Kernel Newbie kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 December, 2008 6:40:42 *Subject:* Re: module

Re: module state:permanent

2008-12-10 Thread Balamurugan Subbian
: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008 6:40:42 Subject: Re: module state:permanent Thanks Sandeep, but still the question holds. Why this module would become permanent ? ~amit On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Sandeep K Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya that's right. On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, amit

Re: module state:permanent

2008-12-10 Thread arshad hussain
] To: Sandeep K Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kernel Newbie kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org Sent: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008 6:40:42 Subject: Re: module state:permanent Thanks Sandeep, but still the question holds. Why this module would become permanent ? ~amit On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Sandeep K

module state:permanent

2008-12-09 Thread amit mehta
Hi All, Why would some module's state become permanent ? i inserted one module and when i try to remove it, i get: *ERROR: Removing 'procsfs1': Device or resource busy* lsmod snip Module Size Used by procsfs13204 0 [permanent] - lsmod snip The

Re: module state:permanent

2008-12-09 Thread Sandeep K Sinha
Ya that's right. On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, amit mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Why would some module's state become permanent ? i inserted one module and when i try to remove it, i get: ERROR: Removing 'procsfs1': Device or resource busy lsmod snip Module

Re: module state:permanent

2008-12-09 Thread amit mehta
Thanks Sandeep, but still the question holds. Why this module would become permanent ? ~amit On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Sandeep K Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Ya that's right. On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, amit mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Why would some module's