Re: why INITIAL_JIFFIES is -300 * HZ?

2010-04-20 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:39, Nagaprabhanjan Bellari wrote: > I am curious to know why jiffies is initialized with INITIAL_JIFFIES which > is -300 * HZ? It is mentioned in the source that jiffies, when initialized > with this value, will make it overflow in 5 minutes. Just wanna add something an

Re: why INITIAL_JIFFIES is -300 * HZ?

2010-04-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Nagaprabhanjan Bellari wrote: > I am curious to know why jiffies is initialized with INITIAL_JIFFIES > which is -300 * HZ? It is mentioned in the source that jiffies, when > initialized with this value, will make it overflow in 5 minutes.   > Can somebody tell me how it helps

Re: why INITIAL_JIFFIES is -300 * HZ?

2010-04-19 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:09 +0530, Nagaprabhanjan Bellari wrote: > I am curious to know why jiffies is initialized with INITIAL_JIFFIES > which is -300 * HZ? It is mentioned in the source that jiffies, when > initialized with this value, will make it overflow in 5 minutes. > > Can somebody tell m

why INITIAL_JIFFIES is -300 * HZ?

2010-04-19 Thread Nagaprabhanjan Bellari
I am curious to know why jiffies is initialized with INITIAL_JIFFIES which is -300 * HZ? It is mentioned in the source that jiffies, when initialized with this value, will make it overflow in 5 minutes. Can somebody tell me how it helps in dealing with jiffy overflow issues at a later point in tim