Hi!
On 20:53 Wed 18 Aug , Daniel Baluta wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Parmenides mobile.parmeni...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
For a critical section protected by a spin lock, kernel preemption is
disabled explicitly, probably to make the critical section atomic.
But,
Hi!
On 01:07 Thu 19 Aug , Parmenides wrote:
Hi,
For a critical section protected by a spin lock, kernel preemption is
disabled explicitly, probably to make the critical section atomic.
But, suppose that an interrupt occures in this critical section,
allowing interrupts can wreck the
Hi,
For a critical section protected by a spin lock, kernel preemption is
disabled explicitly, probably to make the critical section atomic.
But, suppose that an interrupt occures in this critical section,
allowing interrupts can wreck the atomicity. So, why don't we disable
interrupts as a
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Parmenides mobile.parmeni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For a critical section protected by a spin lock, kernel preemption is
disabled explicitly, probably to make the critical section atomic.
But, suppose that an interrupt occures in this critical section,