On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:46 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:09:57 +0900
> Fernando Luis V__zquez Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > With the advent of kdump it is possible that device drivers receive
> > interrupts generated in the context of a previous kernel. Ideally
> > q
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:49:53PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Don Zickus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:39]:
> >
> > I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
> > kexec-tools when building a kernel. Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
> > kernel (and not interes
* Don Zickus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:39]:
>
> I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
> kexec-tools when building a kernel. Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
> kernel (and not interested in kexec) would have to not only download the
> kernel.src.rpm but kex
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:07:40PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> The content of mkdfinfo file has been increasing whenever adding
> features and correcting bugs. The content is increasing even now.
> And, the feature addition is done not only for new kernels but also
> for old upstream kernels.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:07:40PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2007/07/16 18:06:33 +0530, Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:28:54PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> >> * Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-16 14:25]:
> >> >
> >> > Ok. Now ther
Hi,
In latest kernel, we can't use panic_notifier_list if kdump is enabled.
panic_notifier_list is very useful function for debug, failover, etc...
So this patch adds a control file /proc/sys/kernel/dump_after_notifier
and resolves a problem users can not use both kdump and panic_notifier_list
at
On Thursday, 19 July 2007 08:43, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I like the idea but I think I'll let people chat about it a bit more
> > before looking at merging the patches, OK?
>
> I think maybe we should wait for Rafael to separate the device h
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I like the idea but I think I'll let people chat about it a bit more
> before looking at merging the patches, OK?
I think maybe we should wait for Rafael to separate the device hibernate
(quiesce and state save) from device suspend. Without
