On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> Still thinking how we best get elfcorehdr size...
>
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 11:25 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:44:13PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > You could do that but I think a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
[..]
> > >
> > > Then the design would look like the following:
> > > * Define s390_kdump_entry in old kernel that calls crash_kexec()
> > > * Use preallocated ELF core header
> > > * s390_kdump_entry code path stores registers to E
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:35:42PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> On a large ppc64 box I got the following error from kexec -l:
>
> unrecoverable error: could not read
> "/proc/device-tree/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory/ibm,dynamic-memory":
> Bad address
>
> dt_reserve was assuming a p
Hi Mahesh,
This patch is almost good, and there are some cleanup points.
On Wed, 18 May 2011 01:31:01 +0530
Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> +
> +static void
> +clean_dwfl_info(void)
> +{
> + if (dwarf_info.dwfl)
> + dwfl_end(dwarf_info.dwfl);
> +
> + dwarf_info.dwfl = NULL;
> +
On a large ppc64 box I got the following error from kexec -l:
unrecoverable error: could not read
"/proc/device-tree/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory/ibm,dynamic-memory": Bad
address
dt_reserve was assuming a property was never larger than
INIT_TREE_WORDS (65536), but on this box ibm,dynami
