> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> You still have typos here.
>
> I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB over MB.
It is not really a matter of preference. One is correct; the other is not.
While simple errors can of course be forgiven, I
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> You still have typos here.
I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB over MB.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:50:48AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:41:32PM +, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar, at 03:37:48PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > Omar, could you try below patch? Looking at the efi_mem_desc_lookup, it
> > > is not
> > > correct to be
On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:51 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> + if (crash_base == 0) {
> + /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> + crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
> + crash_size, SZ_
On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 11:24 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> +static void ipi_cpu_crash_stop(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs
> *regs)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> + crash_save_cpu(regs, cpu);
> +
> + atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi);
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
Should
