On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:41:30PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>On 04/04/19 at 11:22am, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 04/04/19 at 11:10am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> > On 04/04/19 at 11:00am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> > > On 04/04/19 at 10:52am, Dave Young wrote:
>> > > > On 04/04/19 at 01:23am, Junichi Nomura wrote:
Hello Kairui
On 03/28/19 at 05:49pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> Since kernel commit e6e094e053af75 ("x86/acpi, x86/boot: Take RSDP address
> from boot params if available"), kernel accept a acpi_rsdp_addr param in
> boot_params. Sync the x86_linux_param_header to support this param.
>
> And previously w
Hi Junichi,
While we are still debuggin the bug I reproduced, but for this patch
I have still some comments inline.
BTW, it would be good to start a new thread when you send V4 :)
On 04/02/19 at 10:25am, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> Commit 3a63f70bf4c3a ("x86/boot: Early parse RSDP and save it in
> b
Hi Chao,
On 04/04/19 at 03:20pm, Chao Fan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:41:30PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >On 04/04/19 at 11:22am, Dave Young wrote:
> >> On 04/04/19 at 11:10am, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> > On 04/04/19 at 11:00am, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> > > On 04/04/19 at 10:52am, Dave Young wro
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:41:02PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>Hi Chao,
>On 04/04/19 at 03:20pm, Chao Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:41:30PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> >On 04/04/19 at 11:22am, Dave Young wrote:
>> >> On 04/04/19 at 11:10am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> > On 04/04/19 at 11:00am,
5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit ccec81e4251f5a5421e02874e394338a897056ca ]
When efi=noruntime or efi=oldmap is used on the kernel command line, EFI
services won't be available in the second kernel, therefore the sec
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:41:02PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> It is hard to find 32bit efi hardware, I can confirm all the laptop I
> have are 64bit efi.
You can use 32-bit OVMF with qemu, like in the link Chao gave a couple
of mails earlier.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:32:33PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> BTW, it would be good to start a new thread when you send V4 :)
Yes please.
> > + /* Get systab from boot params. */
> > + systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab |
> > ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi << 32));
> > + if (!sy
On 04/04/19 at 02:22pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:41:02PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > It is hard to find 32bit efi hardware, I can confirm all the laptop I
> > have are 64bit efi.
>
> You can use 32-bit OVMF with qemu, like in the link Chao gave a couple
> of mails earli
On 04/04/19 at 02:24pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:32:33PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > BTW, it would be good to start a new thread when you send V4 :)
>
> Yes please.
>
> > > + /* Get systab from boot params. */
> > > + systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:12:41PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> The early code hang can make people confused, it is hard to
> say what happens and not easy to debug. But if we return 0 then kernel
> just continue to boot, and fail later because of no acpi root pointer, at
> least we can have some k
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:51:27PM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 2019/4/3 19:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:45AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> >> After commit (arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G),
> >> there may be two crash kernel regions
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:44AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should
> reserve some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers.
>
> Kernel would try to allocate at least 256M below 4G automatically
> as x86_64 if crashkernel is
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:25 PM Dave Young wrote:
>
> Hello Kairui
> On 03/28/19 at 05:49pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> > Since kernel commit e6e094e053af75 ("x86/acpi, x86/boot: Take RSDP address
> > from boot params if available"), kernel accept a acpi_rsdp_addr param in
> > boot_params. Sync the x86_l
On 04/04/19 at 04:41pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:12:41PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > The early code hang can make people confused, it is hard to
> > say what happens and not easy to debug. But if we return 0 then kernel
> > just continue to boot, and fail later because
Hi Mike,
On 2019/4/4 22:44, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:51:27PM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 2019/4/3 19:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:45AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
After commit (arm64: kdump: support reserving crashke
Hi Mike,
On 2019/4/4 22:46, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:44AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should
>> reserve some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers.
>>
>> Kernel would try to allocate at le
Hi Mike,
On 2019/4/5 10:17, Chen Zhou wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 2019/4/4 22:44, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:51:27PM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> On 2019/4/3 19:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:05:45AM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
On 4/4/19 4:32 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> While we are still debuggin the bug I reproduced, but for this patch
> I have still some comments inline.
>
> BTW, it would be good to start a new thread when you send V4 :)
Sure.
>> +/* Get systab from boot params. */
>> +systab = (efi_system_table
19 matches
Mail list logo
