Re: mgag200 fails kdump kernel booting

2020-02-04 Thread Baoquan He
Hi Dave, Lyude, On 07/02/19 at 06:51am, David Airlie wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:29 PM Baoquan He wrote: > > > > On 06/26/19 at 04:15pm, Baoquan He wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > We met an kdump kernel boot failure on a lenovo system. Kdump kernel > > > failed to boot, but just reset

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-02-04 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/02/05 13:38), lijiang wrote: > > On (20/02/05 13:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > >> On (20/02/05 12:25), lijiang wrote: [..] > >> > >> So there is a General protection fault. That's the type of a problem that > >> kills the boot for me as well (different backtrace, tho). > > > > Do you

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-02-04 Thread lijiang
> On (20/02/05 13:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> On (20/02/05 12:25), lijiang wrote: >> [..] >>> [ 42.111004] Kernel Offset: 0x1f00 from 0x8100 >>> (relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff) >>> [ 42.111005] general protection fault: [#1] SMP PTI >>> [

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-02-04 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/02/05 13:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (20/02/05 12:25), lijiang wrote: > [..] > > [ 42.111004] Kernel Offset: 0x1f00 from 0x8100 > > (relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff) > > [ 42.111005] general protection fault: [#1] SMP PTI > > [

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-02-04 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/02/05 12:25), lijiang wrote: [..] > [ 42.111004] Kernel Offset: 0x1f00 from 0x8100 (relocation > range: 0x8000-0xbfff) > [ 42.111005] general protection fault: [#1] SMP PTI > [ 42.111005] CPU: 15 PID: 1395 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-02-04 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/02/05 12:25), lijiang wrote: > Hi, John Ogness > > Thank you for improving the patch series and making great efforts. > > I'm not sure if I missed anything else. Or are there any other related > patches to be applied? > > After applying this patch series, NMI watchdog detected a hard

RE: [PATCH] makedumpfile: cope with not-present mem section

2020-02-04 Thread 萩尾 一仁
> -Original Message- > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 02:24:17PM +0800, piliu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to reply late due to a long festival. > > > > I have tested this patch against v4.15 and latest kernel with small > > modification to meet the situation we discussed here. Both work fine. >

Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile: cope with not-present mem section

2020-02-04 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 02:24:17PM +0800, piliu wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to reply late due to a long festival. > > I have tested this patch against v4.15 and latest kernel with small > modification to meet the situation we discussed here. Both work fine. > > The below is the modification of two

[PATCH] kexec: remove useless code in kimage_alloc_page

2020-02-04 Thread Liu Song
From: Liu Song "addr = old_addr" has no effect, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Liu Song --- kernel/kexec_core.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c index 15d70a90b50d..09c60c9347b1 100644 --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c +++