Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile: cope with not-present mem section

On 02/12/2020 12:11 PM, piliu wrote: > > > On 02/06/2020 11:46 AM, piliu wrote: >> >> >> On 02/05/2020 05:18 AM, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾　一仁) wrote: -Original Message- On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 02:24:17PM +0800, piliu wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to reply late due to a long

Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

Hi, John Ogness Thank you for improving the patch series and making great efforts. I'm not sure if I missed anything else. Or are there any other related patches to be applied? After applying this patch series, NMI watchdog detected a hard lockup, which caused that kernel can not boot, please

Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: use the lockless ringbuffer

在 2020年01月29日 00:19, John Ogness 写道: > Replace the existing ringbuffer usage and implementation with > lockless ringbuffer usage. Even though the new ringbuffer does not > require locking, all existing locking is left in place. Therefore, > this change is purely replacing the underlining