Le 28/02/2020 à 06:53, Pingfan Liu a écrit :
At present, plpar_hcall(H_SCM_BIND_MEM, ...) takes a very long time, so
if dumping to fsdax, it will take a very long time.
Take a closer look, during the papr_scm initialization, the only
configuration is through drc_pmem_bind()-> plpar_hcall(H_SCM
Le 28/02/2020 à 06:53, Pingfan Liu a écrit :
Since new_property() is used in several calling sites, splitting it out for
reusing.
To ease the review, although the split out part has coding style issue,
keeping it untouched and fixed in next patch.
The moved function fits in one screen. I don
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> On 28/2/20 4:53 pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > Since new_property() is used in several calling sites, splitting it out for
> > reusing.
> >
> > To ease the review, although the split out part has coding style issue,
> > keeping it untouched a
On 28/2/20 4:53 pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Since new_property() is used in several calling sites, splitting it out for
reusing.
To ease the review, although the split out part has coding style issue,
keeping it untouched and fixed in next patch.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu
To: linuxppc-...@lists.oz
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu
To: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Cc: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Hari Bathini
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
Cc: Dan Williams
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/of_property.c | 8 +---
1 f
At present, plpar_hcall(H_SCM_BIND_MEM, ...) takes a very long time, so
if dumping to fsdax, it will take a very long time.
Take a closer look, during the papr_scm initialization, the only
configuration is through drc_pmem_bind()-> plpar_hcall(H_SCM_BIND_MEM,
...), which helps to set up the bound
Since new_property() is used in several calling sites, splitting it out for
reusing.
To ease the review, although the split out part has coding style issue,
keeping it untouched and fixed in next patch.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu
To: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc:
On 02/27/20 at 08:02am, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:42:53AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/06/20 at 09:51am, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 04:32 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > > In the past, making kallsyms entirely unreadable seemed to break
>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:42:53AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 02/06/20 at 09:51am, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 04:32 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > > In the past, making kallsyms entirely unreadable seemed to break
> > > weird
> > > stuff in userspace. How about havi
On 2020-02-21, Petr Mladek wrote:
> If I get it correctly, the used cmpxchg_relaxed() variants does not
> provide full barriers. They are just able to prevent parallel
> manipulation of the modified variable.
Correct.
I purposely avoided the full barriers of a successful cmpxchg() so that
we cou
10 matches
Mail list logo
