On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:44:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Because We tend to use kexec_file_load more and improve/enhance it in the
> future, and gradually obsolete the old kexec_load interface which this
> patchset is trying to fix on.
That's not going to happen; 32-bit ARM kexec uses the ke
> Am 11.04.2020 um 11:40 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> :
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:44:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> Because We tend to use kexec_file_load more and improve/enhance it in the
>> future, and gradually obsolete the old kexec_load interface which this
>> patchset
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:54:42PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> The runtime cleanup looks a very good one, but I also missed that,
> userspace kexec-tools will break with the efi setup_data changes. But
> kexec_file_load will just work with the cleanup applied.
Hmmm, I wonder if there could be so
On 04/11/20 at 03:43pm, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:54:42PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > The runtime cleanup looks a very good one, but I also missed that,
> > userspace kexec-tools will break with the efi setup_data changes. But
> > kexec_file_load will just work with
On 04/11/20 at 10:30am, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:44:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Because We tend to use kexec_file_load more and improve/enhance it in the
> > future, and gradually obsolete the old kexec_load interface which this
> > patchset is trying