Urgent

2021-08-10 Thread John Kumor
My dear, Greetings! I trust that all is well with you and your family. Did you receive my previous email? Regards John Kumor. ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-10 Thread Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include

Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-10 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > > > On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> @@ -19,7 +19,7

Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-10 Thread Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
On 8/10/21 12:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kern

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] dma-pool: allow user to disable atomic pool

2021-08-10 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 8/5/21 1:54 AM, Baoquan He wrote: > On 06/24/21 at 11:47am, Robin Murphy wrote: >> On 2021-06-24 10:29, Baoquan He wrote: >>> On 06/24/21 at 08:40am, Christoph Hellwig wrote: So reduce the amount allocated. But the pool is needed for proper operation on systems with memory encryption.

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] dma-pool: allow user to disable atomic pool

2021-08-10 Thread Baoquan He
On 08/10/21 at 03:52pm, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 8/5/21 1:54 AM, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 06/24/21 at 11:47am, Robin Murphy wrote: > >> On 2021-06-24 10:29, Baoquan He wrote: > >>> On 06/24/21 at 08:40am, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > So reduce the amount allocated. But the pool is needed for pr

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] dma-pool: allow user to disable atomic pool

2021-08-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 03:52:25PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote: > I think the atomic pool is used by the NVMe driver. My understanding is > that driver will do a dma_alloc_coherent() from interrupt context, so it > needs to use GFP_ATOMIC. The pool was created because dma_alloc_coherent() >