Correction:
On (22/02/25 14:18), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >
> > Or just split panic_printk_sys_info() into these two functions.
>
> Agreed. I also tend to think that panic_printk_sys_info() is needed anyway,
split
On (22/02/24 15:33), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > My bad! I did not spot the `return` at the end of the new branch.
> >
> > + if (console_flush) {
> > + if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG)
> > + console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL);
> > +
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:54:19PM +0100, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:20 AM Coiby Xu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:47:43PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 11/24/21 at 01:47pm, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for a while we've been seen the following error when
On 24/02/2022 11:33, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
> That said, I could live with the patch as is. I leave the decision
> to Andrew. Feel free to use:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
Thanks a bunch Petr and Sergey for the reviews (and the tags).
I also vote to keep the
On Wed 2022-02-23 01:27:35, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (22/02/22 11:10), Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > On 21/02/2022 23:06, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > On (22/02/14 11:13), Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > By additional panic_print messages you mean that
