Hello maintainers,
Sorry to interrupt. Currently I'm holding a machine which can be used
to reproduce the original issue and test the patch. However I may need
to return the machine in a short time. So if any updating and testing
needed for patch v3, please let me know. Thanks in advance!
Thanks,
On Wed 07-06-23 22:29:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 04:14:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Yes, this is exactly how I'd imagine it. Thanks for writing the patch!
> >
> > I'd just note that this would need rebasing on top of Luis' patches 1 and
> > 2. Also:
>
> I'd not do t
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:05:46PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:17:13PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > Provide helpers so that we can check a superblock frozen state.
> > This will make subsequent changes easier to read. This makes
> > no functional changes.
>
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:24:32PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:42:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > How about this as an alternative patch? Kernel and userspace freeze
> > state are stored in s_writers; each type cannot block the other (though
> > you still ca
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:11:30AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 07-06-23 22:29:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 04:14:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Yes, this is exactly how I'd imagine it. Thanks for writing the patch!
> > >
> > > I'd just note that this would need r
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:46:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 07-06-23 09:31:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 04:14:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 22-05-23 16:42:00, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > How about this as an alternative patch? Kernel and userspace fre
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:01:14PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:17:12PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > Right now freeze_super() and thaw_super() are called with
> > different locking contexts. To expand on this is messy, so
> > just unify the requirement to requ
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:42:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> How about this as an alternative patch?
I'm all for it, this is low hanging fruit and I try to get back to it
as no one else does, so I'm glad someone else is looking and trying too!
Hopefully dropping patch 1 and 2 would help wit
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Luis hasn't responded to my question, so I stopped.
Sorry for the delay, by all means alternatives are hugely
welcomed. I just worked on it as it was back logged work and
not a high priority thing for me, so I try to get to it when
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 01:26:19PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:42:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > How about this as an alternative patch?
>
> I'm all for it, this is low hanging fruit and I try to get back to it
> as no one else does, so I'm glad someone else
Baoquan,
On 04/06/2023 20:59, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Zhijian,
>
> On 06/02/23 at 06:26pm, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> After sending out the previous version of the patch set, we received some
>> comments,
>> and we really appreciate your input. However, as you can see, the current
11 matches
Mail list logo
