ng
> and we don't want to add the memory first and apply flags later: it
> should happen within one memblock call.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
> ---
...
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++-
For s390
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:26:35 +0800
> Baoquan He wrote:
>
> > A memory leak is reported by kmemleak scanning:
...
> > The ipl report buffer is allocated via vmalloc, while has no chance to free
> > if the kexe loading
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:31:01AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> unreferenced object 0x38000195000 (size 4096):
> comm "kexec", pid 8548, jiffies 4294953647 (age 32443.270s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 c8 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 02 80 00 00 ...
> 40 40 40 40 40 40
ay fail and
can return an error pointer instead of a valid pointer.
Fix this and simplify by returning NULL in case of an error and let
the only caller handle this case.
Fixes: 99feaa717e55 ("s390/kexec_file: Create ipl report and pass to next
kernel")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens
---
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 03:13:27PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 11/18/21 at 05:46am, kernel test robot wrote:
> >arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c: In function
> > 'arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup':
> > >> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:332:9: error: implicit declaration
> > >>
l.h | 2 -
> kernel/module.c | 12 +++--
> kernel/module_signature.c| 56 +++-
> kernel/module_signing.c | 33 +++---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 22 ++
> 11 files changed, 113 i
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 01:43:00PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:44:30AM +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > @Alexander: Thanks for taking care of this.
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:53:55 +0100
> > Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
> >
> > > Starting with g
Version 2 of Alexander Egorenkov's fix with a changed commit message
as pointed out by Philipp Rudo, and requested by Simon Horman.
Please apply.
Alexander Egorenkov (1):
s390: handle R_390_PLT32DBL reloc entries in machine_apply_elf_rel()
kexec/arch/s390/kexec-elf-rel-s390.c | 3 ++-
1 file
ponding s390 kernel discussion:
*
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20211208105801.188140-1-egore...@linux.ibm.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Alexander Egorenkov
Reported-by: Tao Liu
Suggested-by: Philipp Rudo
Reviewed-by: Philipp Rudo
[h...@linux.ibm.com: changed commit message as requested by Philipp Rudo]
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:57:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:06:34AM +, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > Instead of passing in a 'buf' and 'userbuf' argument, pass in an iov_iter.
> > s390 needs more work to pass the iov_iter down further, or refactor,
> > b
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:23:05PM +0100, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
> Heiko Carstens writes:
> > Given that Alexander is currently not available, I will resend his
> > patch with an updated commit message.
>
> Many thanks for the review and taking care of the review findin
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Add Heiko to CC.
>
> On 04/08/22 at 05:06pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Copy the description of v3 cover letter from Willy:
> > ===
> > For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix
> > compiler warnings in vmcore recen
wn body, and changed the
> priority of such notifiers to execute late, since they are "heavyweight"
> for the panic environment, so we aim to reduce risks here.
> Changed return values to NOTIFY_DONE as well, the standard one.
>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev
> Cc: Christian B
r effectively stopping the machine (s390).
> >
> > This patch introduces yet another notifier list to offer the
> > architectures a way to add callbacks in such late moment on
> > panic path without the need of ifdefs / hardcoded approaches.
> >
> > Cc: Alexand
nged, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
As far as I can tell this doesn't have any dependency to the other
patches in this series, so should I pick this up for the s390 tree, or
how will this go upstream?
In any case:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens
___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:24:49PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Hello Vivek and Eric,
> >
> > I noticed that on my system kernel 3.1 *no* udev events for memory
> > hotplug are generated. Same on my RHEL6.1.
> >
> > # udevadm mon
ta_base.c| 10 ++---
> arch/s390/kernel/debug.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/mm/cmm.c| 6 +--
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens # s390
___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
17 matches
Mail list logo
