On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda
Me too (just in case you want us both).
Acked-by: Jon Mason
>
> Cheers,
> Muli
___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:46:44AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
>
>> > I don't know of anyone still using it, but it's not
>> > impossible. Calgary and CalIOC2 machines would now be ~5-8 years
>> > ol
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:50:41PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> OK, second question... is it time to axe Calgary?
>
> I don't know of anyone still using it, but it's not
> impossible. Calgary and CalIOC2 machines would now be ~5-8 year
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:18 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-calgary.c is the only user of saved_max_pfn today:
>
> int __init detect_calgary(void)
> {
> [..]
> specified_table_size = determine_tce_table_size((is_kdump_kernel() ?
>
