Hi, Mimi
On 12/28/15 at 07:51am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > > contents. The hash is calculated once and used for both measurement
On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 16:21 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Mimi
>
> On 12/28/15 at 07:51am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > > >
On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 07:06 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 16:21 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> This policy flexibility is needed at least until all files come from
> software providers with file signatures. (RPM has been modified to
> include file signatures.) Even then, in terms
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 16:29 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> On 15-12-28 07:51:15, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > > > contents. The
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > contents. The hash is calculated once and used for both measurement
> > and appraisal. If the file integrity appraisal fails
On 15-12-28 09:42:22, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 16:29 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> >
> > I kind of wonder isn't it possible to optimize the file read? If the file
> > is relatively small (a few megabytes, for example) it will fit into any
> > modern system's memory. At least
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > contents. The hash is calculated once and used for both measurement
> > and appraisal. If the file integrity appraisal fails
On 15-12-28 07:51:15, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 10:08 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > IMA calculates the file hash, in this case, based on the buffer
> > > contents. The hash is calculated once and used for both measurement
> > > and
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 16:59 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> On 15-12-28 09:42:22, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 16:29 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> > >
> > > I kind of wonder isn't it possible to optimize the file read? If the
> > > file
> > > is relatively small (a few megabytes,
Hi, Mimi
On 12/25/15 at 09:45am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:33 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi, Mimi
> >
> > CCing kexec list, not all kexec people subscribed to IMA list.
> > I just subscribed to it since Vivek CCed me last time about the V1 of this
> > series.
>
> Thanks!
>
On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:33 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Mimi
>
> CCing kexec list, not all kexec people subscribed to IMA list.
> I just subscribed to it since Vivek CCed me last time about the V1 of this
> series.
Thanks!
> On 12/23/15 at 06:55pm, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > This patch defines a
Hi, Mimi
CCing kexec list, not all kexec people subscribed to IMA list.
I just subscribed to it since Vivek CCed me last time about the V1 of this
series.
On 12/23/15 at 06:55pm, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> This patch defines a new IMA hook ima_hash_and_process_file() for
> measuring and appraising
12 matches
Mail list logo
