This copy really don't need to do at the very second before the kernel
would crash.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
---
arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 30 +++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
> This copy really don't need to do at the very second before the kernel
> would crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
This seems reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Simon Horman
___
kexec mailing list
ke
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
>> This copy really don't need to do at the very second before the kernel
>> would crash.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
>
> This seems reasonable to me.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Ho
TCH] ARM: kdump: copy kernel relocation code at the kexec
> prepare
> stage
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > index e59bbd4..f60fc90 100644
> > --- a/arc
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 07:11:59AM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
> Thanks for this reminding!
> Then how about add flush_icache_range at the end of machine_kexec_prepare?
> Could it be acceptable?
I think it should be done.
> Also with this change, do we still need flush icache at the end stage of
> mach
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index e59bbd4..f60fc90 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,21 @@ static atomic_t waiting_for_
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Lei Wen wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Lei Wen wrote:
>>> This copy really don't need to do at the very second before the kernel
>>> would crash.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lei W
