Re: [PATCH] kexec-arm: add uImage support

2009-11-27 Thread Marc Andre Tanner
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:32:37AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:41:20PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:07:42PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: > > > uImages are basically just zImages with a special header, > > > we therefore just skip the heade

Re: [PATCH] kexec-arm: add uImage support

2009-11-24 Thread Simon Horman
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:41:20PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:07:42PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: > > uImages are basically just zImages with a special header, > > we therefore just skip the header and let the normal zImage > > infrastructure do the actual work. >

Re: [PATCH] kexec-arm: add uImage support

2009-11-21 Thread Andrea Adami
Tested on armv5te. Works perfectly. Already added to OpenEmbedded metadata. Thanks! Andrea ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Re: [PATCH] kexec-arm: add uImage support

2009-11-20 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:07:42PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: > uImages are basically just zImages with a special header, > we therefore just skip the header and let the normal zImage > infrastructure do the actual work. This looks entirely reasonable to me. Unless someone jumps in and commen

[PATCH] kexec-arm: add uImage support

2009-11-20 Thread Marc Andre Tanner
uImages are basically just zImages with a special header, we therefore just skip the header and let the normal zImage infrastructure do the actual work. Signed-off-by: Marc Andre Tanner --- kexec/arch/arm/Makefile |2 + kexec/arch/arm/kexec-arm.c|3 + kexec/arch/arm/kex