Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-02 Thread Azriel Samson
On 3/2/2016 5:33 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote: If you just want rebased set then you may take it from my branch, until next version is released. https://github.com/pratyushanand/linux.git : kexec/upstream_arm64_devel Thanks Pratyush, This should help for now. -- Thanks, Azriel Samson Qualcomm

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-02 Thread Pratyush Anand
On 01/03/2016:10:54:43 AM, Azriel Samson wrote: > We have been using the kexec/kdump patches on ARM64 and would like to use > them from upstream. > > Assuming these are not going to be in Linux-4.5, a rebased set on Linux-4.5 > would be very useful. If you just want rebased set then you may take

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-02 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:17:55 -0800 Geoff Levand wrote: Geoff, > Hi, > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 10:54 -0700, Azriel Samson wrote: > > > We have been using the kexec/kdump patches on ARM64 and would like to > > use them from upstream. > > > > Assuming these are not going to

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-01 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On 03/02/2016 10:38 AM, Will Deacon wrote: On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:17:55PM -0800, Geoff Levand wrote: On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 10:54 -0700, Azriel Samson wrote: We have been using the kexec/kdump patches on ARM64 and would like to use them from upstream. Assuming these are not going to be in

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-01 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:17:55PM -0800, Geoff Levand wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 10:54 -0700, Azriel Samson wrote: > > > We have been using the kexec/kdump patches on ARM64 and would like to > > use them from upstream. > > > > Assuming these are not going to be in Linux-4.5, a rebased set

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-03-01 Thread Azriel Samson
Hi Geoff, On 01/15/16 at 07:18pm, Geoff Levand wrote: This series adds the core support for kexec re-boot and kdump on ARM64.This version of the series combines Takahiro's kdump patches with my kexec patches. Please consider all patches for inclusion. I just tested all the endian combinations

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-01-21 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:56:21AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 01/19/16 at 04:15pm, Geoff Levand wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 20:32 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > Geoff, another question about kexec-tools part is, can the kexec > > > -tools code > > > been written in kernel? We have the

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-01-19 Thread Geoff Levand
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 20:32 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > Geoff, another question about kexec-tools part is, can the kexec > -tools code > been written in kernel? We have the infrastructure for kexec_file_load. I see no technical reason why the arm64 kernel cannot support kexec_file_load. -Geoff

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-01-19 Thread Dave Young
On 01/19/16 at 04:15pm, Geoff Levand wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 20:32 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > Geoff, another question about kexec-tools part is, can the kexec > > -tools code > > been written in kernel? We have the infrastructure for kexec_file_load. > > I see no technical reason why the

Re: [PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-01-19 Thread Dave Young
On 01/15/16 at 07:18pm, Geoff Levand wrote: > This series adds the core support for kexec re-boot and kdump on ARM64. This > version of the series combines Takahiro's kdump patches with my kexec patches. > Please consider all patches for inclusion. > > I just tested all the endian combinations

[PATCH 00/19] arm64 kexec kernel patches v13

2016-01-15 Thread Geoff Levand
This series adds the core support for kexec re-boot and kdump on ARM64. This version of the series combines Takahiro's kdump patches with my kexec patches. Please consider all patches for inclusion. I just tested all the endian combinations of kexec LE->LE, LE->BE, BE->BE, BE->LE, and both LE an