checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
avoided, however, Linus notes:
VM_BUG_ON() has the exact same semantics as BUG_ON. It is literally
no different, the only difference is "we can make the code smaller
because these are less important". [1]
So let's wa
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 18:31 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
> avoided, however, Linus notes:
>
> VM_BUG_ON() has the exact same semantics as BUG_ON. It is literally
> no different, the only difference is "we can make th
On 24.08.22 18:52, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 18:31 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
>> avoided, however, Linus notes:
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON() has the exact same semantics as BUG_ON. It is literally
>> no diffe
On 24.08.22 18:52, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 18:31 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
>> avoided, however, Linus notes:
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON() has the exact same semantics as BUG_ON. It is literally
>> no diffe
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.08.22 18:52, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 18:31 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
>>> avoided, however, Linus notes:
>>>
>>> VM_BUG_ON() has the exact sam
On 25.08.22 13:43, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 24.08.22 18:52, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 18:31 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
checkpatch does not point out that VM_BUG_ON() and friends should be
avoided, however, Linus note
