On 29.09.21 16:22, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 9/29/21 5:03 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 29.09.21 10:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Can we go one step further and do
@@ -20,24 +20,11 @@ static int xen_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
struct xen_hvm_get_mem_type a = {
On 9/29/21 5:03 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.09.21 10:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>
>> Can we go one step further and do
>>
>>
>> @@ -20,24 +20,11 @@ static int xen_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>> struct xen_hvm_get_mem_type a = {
>> .domid =
On 29.09.21 10:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
How about
return a.mem_type != HVMMEM_mmio_dm;
Ha, how could I have missed that :)
Result should be promoted to int and this has added benefit of not requiring
changes in patch 4.
Can we go one step further and do
@@ -20,24 +20,11
How about
return a.mem_type != HVMMEM_mmio_dm;
Ha, how could I have missed that :)
Result should be promoted to int and this has added benefit of not requiring
changes in patch 4.
Can we go one step further and do
@@ -20,24 +20,11 @@ static int xen_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned
On 9/28/21 2:22 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's simplify return handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c | 11 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c
> index
Let's simplify return handling.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
---
arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c
index b242d1f4b426..eb61622df75b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_hvm.c
+++
