On 2022/1/7 16:13, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/25 9:53, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/12/24 14:36, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021/12/24 1:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> From:
On 2021/12/25 9:53, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/24 14:36, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/12/24 1:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
From: Chen Zhou
We will make the functions
On 2021/12/25 9:53, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>> This is exactly why I say that making those functions generic and shared
>>> might not be such a good idea, after all, because then you'd have to
>>> sprinkle around arch-specific stuff.
Hi Borislav and all:
Merry Christmas!
I have a new
On 2021/12/24 14:36, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/24 1:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> From: Chen Zhou
>>>
>>> We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the
>>> xen_pv_domain() check in
On 2021/12/24 1:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> From: Chen Zhou
>>
>> We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the
>> xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to
>> x86,
>
> Why is that so? Is
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> From: Chen Zhou
>
> We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the
> xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to
> x86,
Why is that so? Is Xen-PV x86-only?
> the same as insert_resource() in
From: Chen Zhou
We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the
xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to
x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low]().
So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch()
to keep them
