On 01/19/22 at 08:34pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Lockdep noticed that there is chance for a deadlock if we have
> concurrent mmap, concurrent read, and the addition/removal of a
> callback.
>
> As nicely explained by Boqun:
>
> "
> Lockdep warned about the above sequences because rw_semaphore
On 01/25/22 at 05:09pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 20:34:17 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> > Lockdep noticed that there is chance for a deadlock if we have
> > concurrent mmap, concurrent read, and the addition/removal of a
> > callback.
> >
> > As nicely explained by Boqun:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 20:34:17 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Lockdep noticed that there is chance for a deadlock if we have
> concurrent mmap, concurrent read, and the addition/removal of a
> callback.
>
> As nicely explained by Boqun:
>
> "
> Lockdep warned about the above sequences because
Lockdep noticed that there is chance for a deadlock if we have
concurrent mmap, concurrent read, and the addition/removal of a
callback.
As nicely explained by Boqun:
"
Lockdep warned about the above sequences because rw_semaphore is a fair
read-write lock, and the following can cause a
