Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-23 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:34:21PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > On 23/08/2016:02:29:03 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Pratyush, > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > > > > > I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-23 Thread Pratyush Anand
On 22/08/2016:05:10:17 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:44:23PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > page_offset is the virtual address of phys_offset, right? > > > > ehdr.e_entry is the virtual address of "kernel Code Start PA", right? > > > > If yes, then why should n't

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-23 Thread Pratyush Anand
On 23/08/2016:02:29:03 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Pratyush, > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > > > I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while working with Seattle > > platform. On > > top level, kernel crashes in

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-22 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Pratyush, On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while working with Seattle platform. > On > top level, kernel crashes in copy_oldmem_page(), because it gets wrong offset > for log_buf during

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-22 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:44:23PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > On 19/08/2016:04:19:31 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Pratyush, Geoff > > > > # If I had Seattle, I could debug easily :) > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-19 Thread Pratyush Anand
On 19/08/2016:04:19:31 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Pratyush, Geoff > > # If I had Seattle, I could debug easily :) > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > > > I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while working with Seattle > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-19 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Pratyush, Geoff # If I had Seattle, I could debug easily :) On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > Hi Geoff and Takahiro, > > I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while working with Seattle platform. > On > top level, kernel crashes in copy_oldmem_page(), because

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-10 Thread Pratyush Anand
Hi Geoff and Takahiro, I am having some issues with kexec+kdump while working with Seattle platform. On top level, kernel crashes in copy_oldmem_page(), because it gets wrong offset for log_buf during vmcore-dmesg save. Here is the detail: (1) From /proc/iomem, these are the "System RAM"

[PATCH v2 0/7] (kexec-tools) arm64: add kdump support

2016-08-08 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
My kernel patches of kdump suport on arm64 are currently under reviews [1]. This patchset is synced with them (v24) and provides necessary changes for kexec-tools. It should be applied on top of Geoff's kexec-tools patches v3[2] along with a bugfix[3]. [1]