All functions that search for IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM or IORESOURCE_MEM
resources now properly consider the whole resource tree, not just the first
level. Let's drop the unused first_lvl / siblings_only logic.

Remove documentation that indicates that some functions behave differently,
all consider the full resource tree now.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Young <dyo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.bu...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.de>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.si...@amd.com>
Cc: x...@kernel.org
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/resource.c | 45 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 16e0c7e8ed24..7e00239a023a 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -64,12 +64,8 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock);
 static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bootmem_resource_lock);
 
-static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p, bool sibling_only)
+static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p)
 {
-       /* Caller wants to traverse through siblings only */
-       if (sibling_only)
-               return p->sibling;
-
        if (p->child)
                return p->child;
        while (!p->sibling && p->parent)
@@ -81,7 +77,7 @@ static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
        struct resource *p = v;
        (*pos)++;
-       return (void *)next_resource(p, false);
+       return (void *)next_resource(p);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
@@ -330,14 +326,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
  * of the resource that's within [@start..@end]; if none is found, returns
  * -ENODEV.  Returns -EINVAL for invalid parameters.
  *
- * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children
- * unless @first_lvl is true.
- *
  * @start:     start address of the resource searched for
  * @end:       end address of same resource
  * @flags:     flags which the resource must have
  * @desc:      descriptor the resource must have
- * @first_lvl: walk only the first level children, if set
  * @res:       return ptr, if resource found
  *
  * The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc
@@ -345,9 +337,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
  */
 static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
                               unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
-                              bool first_lvl, struct resource *res)
+                              struct resource *res)
 {
-       bool siblings_only = true;
        struct resource *p;
 
        if (!res)
@@ -358,7 +349,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
 
        read_lock(&resource_lock);
 
-       for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p, siblings_only)) {
+       for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) {
                /* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
                if (p->start > end) {
                        p = NULL;
@@ -369,13 +360,6 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
                if (p->end < start)
                        continue;
 
-               /*
-                * Now that we found a range that matches what we look for,
-                * check the flags and the descriptor. If we were not asked to
-                * use only the first level, start looking at children as well.
-                */
-               siblings_only = first_lvl;
-
                if ((p->flags & flags) != flags)
                        continue;
                if ((desc != IORES_DESC_NONE) && (desc != p->desc))
@@ -402,14 +386,14 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
 
 static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
                                 unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
-                                bool first_lvl, void *arg,
+                                void *arg,
                                 int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
 {
        struct resource res;
        int ret = -EINVAL;
 
        while (start < end &&
-              !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, first_lvl, &res)) {
+              !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
                ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
                if (ret)
                        break;
@@ -431,7 +415,6 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
  * @arg: function argument for the callback @func
  * @func: callback function that is called for each qualifying resource area
  *
- * This walks through whole tree and not just first level children.
  * All the memory ranges which overlap start,end and also match flags and
  * desc are valid candidates.
  *
@@ -441,7 +424,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
 int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
                u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
 {
-       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func);
+       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, arg, func);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
 
@@ -457,8 +440,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
 {
        unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
 
-       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, false,
-                                    arg, func);
+       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
+                                    func);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -470,17 +453,14 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
 {
        unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
 
-       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, false,
-                                    arg, func);
+       return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
+                                    func);
 }
 
 /*
  * This function calls the @func callback against all memory ranges of type
  * System RAM which are marked as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
  * It is to be used only for System RAM.
- *
- * This will find System RAM ranges that are children of top-level resources
- * in addition to top-level System RAM resources.
  */
 int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
                          void *arg, int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, 
void *))
@@ -495,8 +475,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned 
long nr_pages,
        end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
        flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
        while (start < end &&
-              !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
-                                   false, &res)) {
+              !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, &res)) {
                pfn = PFN_UP(res.start);
                end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(res.end + 1);
                if (end_pfn > pfn)
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to