On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 10:26 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> A
> patch making arm64 consistent could be discussed separately, otherwise kdump
> becomes the pedantic ISO guy trying to lead by example, but really everybody
> ignores him because it's completely inconsequential and they also know he
> went
Guys, we were supposed to stop discussing this three days ago.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:44:04AM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:35 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >
> > Because I think that people sometimes use those two interchangeably.
> > So I said I would defer to t
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:35 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> Because I think that people sometimes use those two interchangeably.
> So I said I would defer to the maintainers.
Sometimes they do, yes. Just as sometimes people use "their",
"they're", and "there" interchangeably.
Rarely in a profe
On 4 April 2017 at 08:35, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:14:55AM -, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You still have typos here.
>> >
>> > I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB o
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:14:55AM -, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>
> >> You still have typos here.
> >
> > I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB over MB.
>
> It is not really a matter of preference. One
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> You still have typos here.
>
> I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB over MB.
It is not really a matter of preference. One is correct; the other is not.
While simple errors can of course be forgiven, I
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:18:12AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> You still have typos here.
I'd like to defer to the maintainers whether we prefer MiB over MB.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.
On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:51 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> + if (crash_base == 0) {
> + /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> + crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
> + crash_size, SZ_
On 28 March 2017 at 07:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> "crashkernel=" kernel parameter specifies the size (and optionally
> the start address) of the system ram to be used by crash dump kernel.
> reserve_crashkernel() will allocate and reserve that memory at boot time
> of primary kernel.
>
> The mem
"crashkernel=" kernel parameter specifies the size (and optionally
the start address) of the system ram to be used by crash dump kernel.
reserve_crashkernel() will allocate and reserve that memory at boot time
of primary kernel.
The memory range will be exposed to userspace as a resource named
"Cr
10 matches
Mail list logo
