Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-07-12 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/07/10 10:28), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2020-07-09 15:29:40, John Ogness wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here is a v5 for the first series to rework the printk > > subsystem. The v4 is here [0]. This first series > > only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking > > is remove

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-07-10 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2020-07-09 15:29:40, John Ogness wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a v5 for the first series to rework the printk > subsystem. The v4 is here [0]. This first series > only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking > is removed. The semantics/behavior of printk are kept the same

[PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-07-09 Thread John Ogness
Hello, Here is a v5 for the first series to rework the printk subsystem. The v4 is here [0]. This first series only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking is removed. The semantics/behavior of printk are kept the same except for a minor optimization that is reverted (patch 3).