Hi Dave, Philipp
On 07/10/23 at 07:20pm, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 10:15:53 +0800
> Dave Young wrote:
>
> > On 06/19/23 at 01:59pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > In the current arm64, crashkernel=,high support has been finished after
> > > several rounds of p
Hi Baoquan,
Hi Dave,
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 10:15:53 +0800
Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/19/23 at 01:59pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In the current arm64, crashkernel=,high support has been finished after
> > several rounds of posting and careful reviewing. The code in arm64 which
> > parses crashkernel ker
On 06/19/23 at 01:59pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> In the current arm64, crashkernel=,high support has been finished after
> several rounds of posting and careful reviewing. The code in arm64 which
> parses crashkernel kernel parameters firstly, then reserve memory can be
> a good example for other ARCH t
On 06/19/23 at 01:59pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> In the current arm64, crashkernel=,high support has been finished after
> several rounds of posting and careful reviewing. The code in arm64 which
> parses crashkernel kernel parameters firstly, then reserve memory can be
> a good example for other ARCH t
In the current arm64, crashkernel=,high support has been finished after
several rounds of posting and careful reviewing. The code in arm64 which
parses crashkernel kernel parameters firstly, then reserve memory can be
a good example for other ARCH to refer to.
Whereas in x86_64, the code mixing cr