On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Forcing the second set of requests to filter through an extra software
> > layer is a clumsy way of accomplishing this. There ought to be a
> > better approach.
>
> The point was something different. The reasons we can not store the
> state of
On Saturday, 12 of July 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> >> I just realized with a little care the block layer does have support for
> >> this,
> >> or something very close.
> >>
> >> You setup a sof
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> I just realized with a little care the block layer does have support for
>> this,
>> or something very close.
>>
>> You setup a software raid mirror with one disk device.The physical
>> device can com
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I just realized with a little care the block layer does have support for this,
> or something very close.
>
> You setup a software raid mirror with one disk device.The physical
> device can come in and out while the filesystems depend on the rea
