h 8, 2013 1:54:37 PM
>> Subject: 3.9-rc1: crash kernel panic - not syncing: Can not allocate SWIOTLB
>> buffer earlier and can't now provide you
>> with the DMA bounce buffer
>>
>> Hi, All
>>
>> On 3.9-rc1, I load crash kernel with latest kexec-tools
>>> To: "LKML" vger.kernel.org>
>>> Cc: "CAI Qian"
>>> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 1:54:37 PM
>>> Subject: 3.9-rc1: crash kernel panic - not syncing: Can not allocate
>>> SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you
is intended...
>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "WANG Chao"
>>>> To: "LKML" vger.kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: "CAI Qian"
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 1:54:37 PM
>>>> Subject: 3.9
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
>>
>> looks like your system DO have DMAR table, please enable dmar
>> remapping in your kernel config.
>
> I've already got following config:
> CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE=y
> CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU=y
> CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP=y
>
> but I don't have intel_iommu=on in
On 03/08/2013 03:27 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
>>>
>>> looks like your system DO have DMAR table, please enable dmar
>>> remapping in your kernel config.
>>
>> I've already got following config:
>> CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE=y
>> CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU=y
>> CONFIG
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:33 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 03:27 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
looks like your system DO have DMAR table, please enable dmar
remapping in your kernel config.
>>>
>>> I've already got following confi
(2013/03/08 16:33), WANG Chao wrote:
On 03/08/2013 03:27 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
looks like your system DO have DMAR table, please enable dmar
remapping in your kernel config.
I've already got following config:
CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE=y
CONFIG_INTEL
again...
CAI Qian
- Original Message -
> From: "WANG Chao"
> To: "LKML" vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "CAI Qian"
> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 1:54:37 PM
> Subject: 3.9-rc1: crash kernel panic - not syncing: Can not allocate SWIOTLB
> buffer earlie
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
>> what is 00:02.0 in your system?
> This IOMMU issue is related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/26/814. We can
> discuss this IOMMU issue in that thread.
> Anyway 00:02.0 is a video card, the box is Ivy Bridge.
> # lspci -s 00:02.0 -v
> 00:02.0 V
[ Add more to To list ]
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
>
>>> what is 00:02.0 in your system?
>> This IOMMU issue is related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/26/814. We can
>> discuss this IOMMU issue in that thread.
>> Anyway
On 03/09/2013 03:39 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [ Add more to To list ]
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
>>
what is 00:02.0 in your system?
>>> This IOMMU issue is related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/26/814. We can
>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:39:51AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [ Add more to To list ]
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
> >
> >>> what is 00:02.0 in your system?
> >> This IOMMU issue is related to https://lkml.org/lkml/20
12 matches
Mail list logo