> > > > Is this a regression? Has this compiler ever been able to build this
> > > > arch like this?
> > >
> > > Yes. It is a regression with gcc-11.
> > >
> > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED
> > > stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASSED
> >
> > Ah, ok, and
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > Following build errors
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14
> > > with gcc-11 for
On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14
> > with gcc-11 for powerpc architecture.
> Is this a regression? Has this compiler ever been
x-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' defconfig
>
> make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8
> O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current ARCH=powerpc
> CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
> Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.
=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache
powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.unlikely.
kernel/kexec_file.o: failed
make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:273:
kernel/kexec_file.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Deleting file 'kernel/kexec_file.o'
Build
