On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 20:51 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:12:59PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 19:03 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > The problem is that we're using stacked git, which doesn't yet actually
> > > support remote repositories. So regular patc
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:12:59PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 19:03 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > The problem is that we're using stacked git, which doesn't yet actually
> > support remote repositories. So regular patches are easier at this
> > point.
>
> When you said "stack
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 19:03 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:35:59PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:28 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:52:18PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > >
> > > > >to fix some of these issues happily review
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:35:59PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:28 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:52:18PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >
> > > >to fix some of these issues happily reviewed :)
> > >
> > >Erm, it's either you created the trees
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:28 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:52:18PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> > >to fix some of these issues happily reviewed :)
> >
> >Erm, it's either you created the trees too soon, or we (most probably)
> > dalayed with updating the patches too
Forwarding to the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vitaly Wool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 11, 2006 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kgdb git tree doesn't build
To: Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 9/11/06, Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Thanks! Now it work f
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:33:13PM +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On 9/7/06, Vitaly Wool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The trees aren't in a consistent state just yet. I've updated the
> >> master copies just now, and they should hit mirrors shortly.
> >
> >Thanks! Now it work for m
Hello Tom,
On 9/7/06, Vitaly Wool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The trees aren't in a consistent state just yet. I've updated the
> > master copies just now, and they should hit mirrors shortly.
>
> Thanks! Now it work for me basically, still PXA w/ KGDB doesn't build.
> The small patch to fix t
Attached patch moves weak definitions from kernel/kgdb.c to
kernel/kgdbarchlib.c to get rid of gcc 4.1 bug.
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 16:40 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:24:32PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I stumbled over some
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:29, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:26:48PM +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote:
> > Moving weak definitions to some other new source file can also get rid
> > of this. We are working on it.
>
> Hmm. Off-list Andrew suggested to me that it's time we make a
>
I agree with Tom. KGDB without debug info is more or less unusable on MIPS
(and most non-x86 architectures).
Someone who can run gdb without debug info, should also have the expertise to
disable compilation of debug info during a kernel compilation. We don't need
to add a specific Kconfig optio
11 matches
Mail list logo
