Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH 1/3] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume

2010-01-31 Thread Dongdong Deng
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: > Dongdong Deng wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jason Wessel >> wrote: >> >>> echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_thresh >>> >>> And then some kernel code in a thread like: >>>        local_irq_disable(); >>>        printk("Disable

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH 1/3] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume

2010-01-31 Thread Jason Wessel
Dongdong Deng wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jason Wessel > wrote: > >> echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_thresh >> >> And then some kernel code in a thread like: >>local_irq_disable(); >>printk("Disable local irq for 11 seconds\n"); >>mdelay(11000); >>

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH 1/3] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume

2010-01-31 Thread Dongdong Deng
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Jason Wessel wrote: >> >> >>> @@ -118,6 +125,14 @@ void softlockup_tick(void) >>>      } >>> >>>      if (touch_ts == 0) { >>> +            if (unlikely(per_cpu(softlock_touch_sync, this_cpu))) { >>> +                

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH 0/40] kgdb, kdb and atomic kernel modesetting series

2010-01-31 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 08:58 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote: > This is version 2 of the series posted in December. > > Thank you very much to everyone who provided feedback on the original > patch set. Did I mention, you're *awesome*. Thanks so much for this patch series, it's really helpful and works