Re: [Kicad-developers] BOM support

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 07/31/2010 03:42 PM, Karl Schmidt wrote: > Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > >> For eventual BOM generation, we may have to provide even more >> flexibility, so this may not be the final behavior, but with this email >> I am trying to get you the ability to generate these files here, nothing >> more y

Re: [Kicad-developers] BOM support

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 07/31/2010 03:32 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > On 07/30/2010 12:03 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > >>> I am trying to reach the right comprise between clarity and lack of >>> verbosity, and to avoid situations where we have to change ' ' with >>> '_' by keeping things wrapped with proper XML synt

Re: [Kicad-developers] Feature Request: CvPCB search function

2010-07-31 Thread Alex G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/01/2010 12:40 AM, Michael Heidinger wrote: > Hi, > > selecting items from CvPCB can sometimes be difficult if you have > several thousand of footprints added. Scrolling down and searching > alphabetically is consuming much time. > It would be re

[Kicad-developers] Feature Request: CvPCB search function

2010-07-31 Thread Michael Heidinger
Hi, selecting items from CvPCB can sometimes be difficult if you have several thousand of footprints added. Scrolling down and searching alphabetically is consuming much time. It would be really fast if above the list of the footprints in CvPCB a textfield would be added and then you enter the

Re: [Kicad-developers] BOM support

2010-07-31 Thread Karl Schmidt
Dick Hollenbeck wrote: For eventual BOM generation, we may have to provide even more flexibility, so this may not be the final behavior, but with this email I am trying to get you the ability to generate these files here, nothing more yet. I think you are on the right track - might be that dea

Re: [Kicad-developers] Testing boost::polygon in pcbnew.

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 07/31/2010 08:20 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote: > Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : > >> On 07/28/2010 07:04 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >> >>> On 07/27/2010 02:31 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: >>> To compile with boost::polygon, run cmake with option -DUSE_BOOST_POLYGON_LIBRAR

Re: [Kicad-developers] CPack integration for crossplatform creation of binary and source archives -- patch

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
> I have zero experience with Python programming, and I have time to learn > it. Take that as a NO? > Maybe somebody else with experience can have a look at it. And why are those > things not handled with CMake itself in form of Variables? > Because nobody, including you nor me nor anyone e

Re: [Kicad-developers] CPack integration for crossplatform creation of binary and source archives -- patch

2010-07-31 Thread Jerry Jacobs
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Jerry, > > Some questions below: > >> Dear all, >> >> As I was trying to find a neat way to create mac packages on the fly I >> bumped to CPack. This application is shipped with CMake and can be used >> inside the existing CMakeLists.txt co

Re: [Kicad-developers] CPack integration for crossplatform creation of binary and source archives -- patch

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Jerry, Some questions below: > Dear all, > > As I was trying to find a neat way to create mac packages on the fly I > bumped to CPack. This application is shipped with CMake and can be used > inside the existing CMakeLists.txt configuration. For mac I enabled for > now only DragNDrop packages

Re: [Kicad-developers] Testing boost::polygon in pcbnew.

2010-07-31 Thread jean-pierre charras
Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : On 07/28/2010 07:04 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: On 07/27/2010 02:31 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: To compile with boost::polygon, run cmake with option -DUSE_BOOST_POLYGON_LIBRARY=ON (see changelog). Jean-Pierre: I found the boost library to require only 40

Re: [Kicad-developers] BOM support

2010-07-31 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 07/30/2010 12:03 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >> I am trying to reach the right comprise between clarity and lack of >> verbosity, and to avoid situations where we have to change ' ' with >> '_' by keeping things wrapped with proper XML syntax. >> > > The attached file is a revision that actu