>[components] --A--> [KiCad board file] --B--> [pcb hardware]
>The point is that you cannot restrict A, B, C or D with copyright.
Ah, thank you! You have now clearly defined the core concern: A.
Altium is a well lawyered-up EDA company and if you read their EULA
they seem to believe they
Dick,
The point is that you cannot restrict A, B, C or D with copyright.
--brian
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> [components] --A--> [KiCad board file] --B--> [pcb hardware]
>
> [components] --C--> [Commercial software board file]
>
>
> Seems we have universal agreement tha
Fabrizio,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012, Fabrizio Tappero wrote:
> Brian,
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
> wrote:
> > Karl,
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> There is a very easy solution to all this - use the LGPL for anything
> >> that gets distribute
I think that while C would be a concern if KiCAD were a commercial
effort, it is in fact desirable for an open source project to be thus
pillaged. Either true value added is provided by a good company and
KiCAD get's some credit; or you sic the EFF on them and get some publicity.
Anyway, here's my
[components] --A--> [KiCad board file] --B--> [pcb hardware]
[components] --C--> [Commercial software board file]
Seems we have universal agreement that we are not trying to restrict A or B.
[pcb hardware] --D--> [pcb hardware]
There is some question as to whether anyone can restrict cop
Brian,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
wrote:
> Karl,
>
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Karl Schmidt wrote:
>
>> There is a very easy solution to all this - use the LGPL for anything
>> that gets distributed with kicad and don't think or talk about it any
>> more. - Ever.
>
> An LGP
6 matches
Mail list logo
