On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 05:33 PM, Chris Giorgi wrote:
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I've been glancing at this thread on&off for a while and have and have
> an observation
> > and suggestion.
> >
> > A board has a distinct set of lamination layers:
>
On 11/13/2012 05:33 PM, Chris Giorgi wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I've been glancing at this thread on&off for a while and have and have an
> observation
> and suggestion.
>
> A board has a distinct set of lamination layers:
> Front
> Inner 1
>:
> Inner n
> Back
>
> Each la
Good afternoon,
I've been glancing at this thread on&off for a while and have and have an
observation and suggestion.
A board has a distinct set of lamination layers:
Front
Inner 1
:
Inner n
Back
Each lamination may have one or more physical materials or operations:
Su
On 11/13/2012 10:16 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
The open issue of changing the non-copper names is best settled if we had a
complete
list of proposed names to change to, and to make the determination if this is
worth the
disruption.
Aw oh. I slept on it and woke up thinking about this as my
On 11/12/2012 4:38 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 11/12/2012 12:19 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 11/11/2012 9:46 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 11/11/2012 08:07 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 11/10/2012 11:13 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
*Observations:*
a) Layernames should be in English always
Le 13/11/2012 16:16, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
The open issue of changing the non-copper names is best settled if we had a
complete
list of proposed names to change to, and to make the determination if this is
worth the
disruption.
Aw oh. I slept on it and woke up thinking about this as my
On 11/12/2012 08:22 AM, Ãyvind Aabling wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Alex G. wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2012 10:40 AM, Simon Turner wrote:
>>> The problem is made worse by the fact that when you edit a footprint or
>>> symbol in the schematic of pcb it can revert back later so it is very
>>> frustrating
> The open issue of changing the non-copper names is best settled if we had a
> complete
list of proposed names to change to, and to make the determination if this is
worth the
disruption.
Aw oh. I slept on it and woke up thinking about this as my first conscious
waking
thoughts this morning
8 matches
Mail list logo
