I have only now noticed that naming the checkbox mark all components is
not so good because there is a button called find marker, and here,
marker means something completely different (DRC marker)
But I think, the find dialog is not a good place for this. Yes, I want to
find a marker. But,
I was comparing my tree with the master one. These are some changes
I did in times and I would like what do you think of these
- GenDate() at the moment uses a fixed format (more or less the european
one), with the months hardcoded to the short english names.
Wouldn't it be better to use the
On 04/28/2013 06:41 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
I was comparing my tree with the master one. These are some changes
I did in times and I would like what do you think of these
- GenDate() at the moment uses a fixed format (more or less the european
one), with the months hardcoded to the
On 04/27/2013 12:10 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:11:54AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
But how important is that really? Will it result in a reduction in pay?
The common user has been a hobbyist, and is becoming a corporate employee
as the
software gets better.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 08:09:29AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
GenDate() is not my function, so I could only offer an opinion but no
protective mandate.
I am neutral, and to formulate a strong opinion would require a study of its
usage, for
which I do not have the time.
AFAIK mostly
Hi Guys,
I'm just catching up with the list, and I saw something that caught my eye
as it's something that's been on my mind for a while:
--
Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
- Right now, I am finding too many bugs in the software ...
- We might do well as a team by slowing down
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 03:33:32PM +0200, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
AFAIK mostly reports and sheet border. I'll investigate.
Correction, it's *only* for the title block. The default (%x)
formatting (for the italian locale, at least) is numeric only
(like dd/mm/) so it's *very* easy to
Every wx releases something works slightly different...
I'm trying to use wx 2.9.4 (installed with the wxPython distribution)
Configured OK, building woes:
static int wxCALLBACK MyCompareFunction( long aItem1, long aItem2, long
aSortData )
{
wxString* component1Name = (wxString*) aItem1;
Le 27/04/2013 18:42, Lorenzo Marcantonio a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:31:54PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
GCC 4.8 is fully 0x11 compliant with one minor exception (see the
Have they fixed the misoptimization breaking the zone filling code at
least?
About zone filling code and
Le 28/04/2013 13:41, Lorenzo Marcantonio a écrit :
I was comparing my tree with the master one. These are some changes
I did in times and I would like what do you think of these
- GenDate() at the moment uses a fixed format (more or less the european
one), with the months hardcoded to the
.
On Apr 28, 2013 8:31 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio l.marcanto...@logossrl.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 08:09:29AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
GenDate() is not my function, so I could only offer an opinion but no
protective mandate.
I am neutral, and to formulate a strong opinion would
I agree that some kind of automated QA tests for the project would be great,
Adam wolf and I
had a conversation about that recently.
I've seen many projects dramatically increasing quality because of regression
testing. I'm not
sure how well is wx prepared for the UI parts, but we can do it
On Apr 28, 2013 10:54 AM, Brian Sidebotham brian.sidebot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm just catching up with the list, and I saw something that caught my
eye as it's something that's been on my mind for a while:
--
Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
- Right now, I am
The other thing I learned was that python can call
arbitrary C functions in an arbitrary dll, even if they are not
swigged.
Sure, ctypes
is, IMHO, one of the coolest standard library modules.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 03:50:09PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
The interface is correct. Setting any angle is desired. The implentation
is insufficient in this case. The black box is broken and needs
embellishment.
I chose what the dog is to do when we started the plugins. The tail is
On Apr 28, 2013 11:09 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio l.marcanto...@logossrl.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 03:50:09PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
The interface is correct. Setting any angle is desired. The
implentation
is insufficient in this case. The black box is broken and needs
On Apr 28, 2013 11:19 PM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013 11:09 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio
l.marcanto...@logossrl.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 03:50:09PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
The interface is correct. Setting any angle is desired. The
implentation
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:19:02PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Can you name the class where setangle, the interface, cannot successfully
set an angle of any degree, without talking about client code?
No, I didn't look for it, but the compiler flagged that (innocuous) swap
so there *could* be
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:40:07PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Client code is simply that which makes calls to an interface, a class user.
I don't see a problem if an interface is richer than its clients need.
Since you changed the specifications (an angle can be arbitrary) the
client needs
19 matches
Mail list logo
