Hi Orson,
I went ahead and updated the code an recomplied. The segfault is indeed
gone!
The steps I have been taking to get this error are as follow:
* open kicad, pcbnew
* Switch to OpenGL canvas
* open module editor
* click the new module icon
* add a pad, hit esc to get out of the add pad tool
Thanks for the release information Dick, we'll look to include that in
Winbuilder as soon as possible. At the moment the version used is a
patched v3.0.0, not a vanilla version. Therefore some vital fixes for
KiCad were already included. It will be good to upgrade to get the bug
fixes though.
Jaso
Question: aren't the new layer names enum values (F_Mask and so on)
contrary to the most commonly accepted practice of having constants in
all upper case? (don't remember if the coding policy talks about that)
Is there a particular reason for that? IMHO these names are easily
confused with variabl
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:14:43PM +0200, jp charras wrote:
> This explains core developers (mainly Dick who made 99% of the work)
> started and *finished* the work to expand the number of layers.
I had a lot of the job done too, at least on a trial basis. Asked for
feedback on the list and got th
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:00:45AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Generally you should not expect me to beg to make my contributions. We've
> had more than
> enough discussions in the past about how to hold layers, and no agreement was
> in sight.
At least some thing on the mailing list would
<>
>>>
>>> JP, Wayne and I developed the following working blueprint and attached
>>> spreadsheet.
>>> Spreadsheet from JP.
>>
>> Dick,
>>
>> What was your reason for keeping this blueprint secret and not involving
>> CERN (as well as other important developers) in the discussion?
>>
>> I si
On 07/01/2014 10:44 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> On 01.07.2014 17:16, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> On 06/30/2014 02:34 PM, Javier Serrano wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio
>>>
>>> wrote:
I see the commits. Could have be useful to know before since both me and
>>
On 01.07.2014 17:16, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 06/30/2014 02:34 PM, Javier Serrano wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio
wrote:
I see the commits. Could have be useful to know before since both me and the
cern
people were already working on that.
I confirm we had a ph
Hi Jon,
I cannot recreate the bug, do you mind adding some details? Does it
happen every time? If not, are there any repeatable steps to reproduce
the error? Does it crash afterwards or you are still able to edit the
footpritn? Did you edit an existing module or created a new one? Which
wxWid
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:29:07AM +0200, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
> > Oh yes, the OMAP ones can be worse. A huge section of the chip errata
> > have to do with USB issues, and I'm not happy with the length of
> > TI's chip errat
10 matches
Mail list logo
