On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Andy Peters de...@latke.net wrote:
On Jan 10, 2015, at 10:35 PM, Fat-Zer fatz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've got a some ideas how to improve some parts if kicad schematics
library.
1. A common schematics:
There are a bunch of compomets with nearly the
On 1/14/2015 2:13 PM, jp charras wrote:
Le 14/01/2015 19:32, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo a écrit :
As a reference: In other EDA tools they can load newer files on older
versions of the software. They just open a warning window with
everything which is not read/processed, and tell you everything
On 14 Jan 2015, at 21:07, Cirilo Bernardo cirilo.berna...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch
mailto:tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch wrote:
On 13.01.2015 20:11, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
This is a tricky issue that has been discussed
In response to a message written on 07.01.2015, 19:29, from Adam Wolf:
I dunno, LordBlick, it looks pretty Pythonic to me!
Also, I do not think
dict(map(lambda lname: lname, layers_tuple.index(lname), layers_tuple))
is clearer than using a dictionary called layer_dict :)
Auto-generated
On 13.01.2015 20:11, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
This is a tricky issue that has been discussed before. The general
consensus in the past has been not to support forward compatibility. It
increases maintenance and complexity of the file parser for a minimal
net gain to the user. My preference is
5 matches
Mail list logo
