HI Cirilo,
is there a repository for IDF 3d modules?
Maurice
On 20/06/2015 02.53, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
Hello everybody,
Marcos Chaparro has added a screenshot to the wikipedia entry on KiCad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KiCad#/media/File:KiCad_3D_with_IDF.png
The screenshot shows the
2015-06-20 2:53 GMT+02:00 Cirilo Bernardo :
> Hello everybody,
>
> Marcos Chaparro has added a screenshot to the wikipedia entry on KiCad:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KiCad#/media/File:KiCad_3D_with_IDF.png
>
> The screenshot shows the new 3D Viewer rendering of the video demo board
> along wi
I was going to recommend the HackRF or Ubertooth One...
Adam Wolf
On Jun 19, 2015 9:39 PM, "Jared Boone" wrote:
> I might be a bit biased here, but I would volunteer either the HackRF One
> design:
>
> https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/hardware/hackrf-one
>
> or the Daisho F
I might be a bit biased here, but I would volunteer either the HackRF One
design:
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/tree/master/hardware/hackrf-one
or the Daisho FPGA main board design:
https://github.com/mossmann/daisho/tree/master/hw/main_board
Both are quite complex and dem
Hello everybody,
Marcos Chaparro has added a screenshot to the wikipedia entry on KiCad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KiCad#/media/File:KiCad_3D_with_IDF.png
The screenshot shows the new 3D Viewer rendering of the video demo board
along with a VRML rendering of an exported IDF file. Perhaps thi
It looks like they were added by JPC in rev 3119.
2015-06-20 0:14 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
> Someone added the following code to all of the Eeschema toolbars:
>
> SetToolBorderPadding(2); // padding
> SetToolSeparation(0);
>
> but none of the other app window toolbars have this (pcbnew, gerbvie
Someone added the following code to all of the Eeschema toolbars:
SetToolBorderPadding(2); // padding
SetToolSeparation(0);
but none of the other app window toolbars have this (pcbnew, gerbview,
cvpcb). I removed it and I cannot see any difference in the Eeschema
toolbars. If no one can justify
Chris,
I'm not opposed to this patch. I actually prefer the footprint viewer
over the footprint search dialog for two reasons. One, the footprint
viewer uses lazy loading (it doesn't actually read the footprint files
until you select a library) so there is no lag showing the viewer due to
loadin
I had a senior moment. You are correct. This should have been for your
footprint exchange dialog patch. Sorry for the noise. I will reply to
the correct email momentarily.
On 6/19/2015 5:43 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Am I just missing something, or did you reply to the wrong mail? ;)
>
> On F
Am I just missing something, or did you reply to the wrong mail? ;)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:37:16PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I'm not opposed to this patch. I actually prefer the footprint viewer
> over the footprint search dialog for two reasons. One, the footprint
> viewer
Chris,
I'm not opposed to this patch. I actually prefer the footprint viewer
over the footprint search dialog for two reasons. One, the footprint
viewer uses lazy loading (it doesn't actually read the footprint files
until you select a library) so there is no lag showing the viewer due to
loadin
So I haven't been active for the last few months but I have been
running coverity weekly at least ;)
I noticed this one three months ago
4bool PNS_DIFF_PAIR_PLACER::tryWalkDp( PNS_NODE* aNode, PNS_DIFF_PAIR
&aPair, bool aSolidsOnly )
245{
246PNS_DIFF_PAIR best;
247double bestScore = 1
Committed in 5794, thanks!
Cheers,
Orson
On 06/19/2015 06:50 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> On 19.06.2015 18:35, jp charras wrote:
>> Among issues detected by Coverity, 3 of them worried me.
>> (see attached text for these 3 Coverity bugs or strange things)
>>
>> - In shape_collisions.cpp , Colli
This section was rewritten in the updated version I sent in yesterday,
but the same bug exists in another place. Here's an updated version of
the new patch.
Alternatively, if you'd rather fix the existing version instead of
applying the new patch, just change the line in question:
280
On 19.06.2015 18:35, jp charras wrote:
> Among issues detected by Coverity, 3 of them worried me.
> (see attached text for these 3 Coverity bugs or strange things)
>
> - In shape_collisions.cpp , CollideShapes compares 4 shapes.
> One case ( SH_RECT / SH_RECT ) is strange, because the actual compa
Among issues detected by Coverity, 3 of them worried me.
(see attached text for these 3 Coverity bugs or strange things)
- In shape_collisions.cpp , CollideShapes compares 4 shapes.
One case ( SH_RECT / SH_RECT ) is strange, because the actual compaison
is SH_CIRCLE / SH_RECT.
Is it OK (if yes, a
Fix committed in product branch r5787. Thanks.
On 6/18/2015 10:23 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Oops, the same thing has to be applied in pcbnew. Patch attached.
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:43:56PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> Patch committed in product branch r5782. Thanks.
>>
>> On 6/16/2
Thanks JP, thats it (width = 2*aClearanceValue).
I understand, my question was just for "visual / dimensional proposes"
understanding, so I now understand what that code is doing.
Mario Luzeiro
From: jp charras [jp.char...@wanadoo.fr]
Sent: 19 June 2015 11
Le 18/06/2015 22:53, Mário Luzeiro a écrit :
> Hello Jean-Pierre || all,
>
> @file board_items_to_polygon_shape_transform.cpp
> @function D_PAD::TransformShapeWithClearanceToPolygon
> @line 613
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-source-mirror/blob/0cab3e47ad8097db7b898b3cef2cf9b235318ca3/pcbnew/boar
Le 18/06/2015 23:10, Martin d'Allens a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Changing the grid size in the 3D viewer currently hides the grid until
> some other display parameter is toggled. The reason is that the grid
> should be explicitely rebuilt by calling CreateDrawGL_List(). The
> attached patch should fix
This seems a great addon to KiCad.
It would be great to have the same thing in PCBNew.
Thanks!
2015-06-19 3:22 GMT+02:00 Chris Pavlina :
> Here's the second revision of my Eeschema field autoplacing tool. The
> following changes have been made:
>
> - Autoplace understands text justification
> -
Hi Nick,
I just make the opposite diff :)
thanks!
please find attached the right one...
this small attached patch that could improve the DXF
importing understanding...
I add to the DXF import menu the info (R12 fully supported, units mm)
so users will have this info immediately...
[ documentatio
22 matches
Mail list logo
