Re: [Kicad-developers] idea for post-release file manipulations

Hey OSX devs, great to hear that some of those UI issues will possibly be addressed before the stable release! As far as I can tell the combo box/drop-down menu bug in pcbnew only affects the menus listed by Jean-Paul: Track Width, Via Diameter, Grid Size, Zoom Size. The Active Layer Switch dr

[Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

Hi, A moment ago I had the idea of include open source projects in the demos/ directory. There are enough high quality open source projects out there, most of them would be happy to be included in kicad, its a way for them to get closer to the community. It is also a way for kicad to get closer to

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Use new footprint selector for "Change Footprints"

On 6/22/2015 1:20 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 21/06/2015 22:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >> Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Is there any objection to >> getting rid of the search dialog or do you prefer adding both a search >> (current dialog) and a browse (Chris's patch) option to selec

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] lib-cache-rescue upgrade

Chris, Is this patch good to go? I'm having trouble keeping up with the patch volume so I want to make sure before I commit it. Thanks, Wayne On 6/18/2015 3:07 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Hi all, > > It's come to my attention that we have another old project compatibility > issue: > > https:

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] lib-cache-rescue upgrade

No - I attached another in response to JP's recent mail about Coverity. Here it is again: Chris, Is this patch good to go? I'm having trouble keeping up with the patch volume so I want to make sure before I commit it. Thanks, Wayne On 6/18/2015 3:07 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Hi all, > > It's

Re: [Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

The images are missing. 2015-06-22 6:16 GMT+02:00 Marcos Chaparro : > Hi, > A moment ago I had the idea of include open source projects in the demos/ > directory. > > There are enough high quality open source projects out there, most of them > would be happy to be included in kicad, its a way for

Re: [Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

Hi, My opinions / ideas about this: I prefer that non-source code stuff could move out from the source code repository. Unless it is for example a test data (test board) to validate and test the development. I see right now the demos/ folder is almost 8MB of data. I am not sure about to add thi

Re: [Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

I think it is a good idea to have easily accessible demo projects in kicad, but I do also agree that they don't nessesarely in the source repo, they could be kept somewhere else for the packagers to package. 2015-06-22 15:33 GMT+02:00 Mário Luzeiro : > Hi, > > My opinions / ideas about this: > I p

Re: [Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

For some reason the images are displayed in my inbox but not in the launchpad website. See below: https://www.flickr.com/gp/mrkindustries/t62h47 I agree about moving the demos out of the source code, but its a long shot for me to suggest that, I don't know what its the best way to have the projec

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update dangling ends when adding no-connect

Since my recent change to hide dangling ends also responds to no-connect markers, SCH_NO_CONNECT should be changed to correctly update dangling ends after it is placed. This patch accomplishes that. -- Chris commit 32d30d6b24bc75bdfa300153d5e4430a15234456 Author: Chris Pavlina Date: Mon Jun 2

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: better annotation dialog checkbox messaging

On 6/20/2015 4:38 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: > Hi, > The checkbox labels in the annotation dialog are hard to understand > because they are passive voice and not very clear (What does 'Silent > mode' mean ?). > Also, the default for the 'Automatically close dialog' (which is > false) doesn't really m

[Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #421

See Changes: [Wayne Stambaugh] Eeschema: component library rescue improvements. * Fix case sensitive component library name searches * Factor out rescue code into a generic rescue project class. --

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

Hi, One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward annotation process. The attached patch set attempts to improve this by adding an "Update PCB From schematics" option in eeschema when Kicad is open in Project Manager mode. The way it works is: - press F9 (or select Tools->Upda

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: better annotation dialog checkbox messaging

On 22 June 2015 at 08:42, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 6/20/2015 4:38 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: >> Hi, >> The checkbox labels in the annotation dialog are hard to understand >> because they are passive voice and not very clear (What does 'Silent >> mode' mean ?). >> Also, the default for the 'Automa

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

This sounds good, but I wonder why this is not invoked from pcbnew instead. Can you explain this design decision? (I have not tested the patches yet) 2015-06-22 17:58 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Wlostowski : > Hi, > > One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward > annotation process. T

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On 22.06.2015 18:16, Nick Østergaard wrote: > This sounds good, but I wonder why this is not invoked from pcbnew > instead. I don't want it to be invoked from PCBnew *instead*. Of course adding "import changes from SCH" in pcbnew is an option, it would require one more KIWAY_EXPRESS message. > Can

[Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #422

See Changes: [Wayne Stambaugh] Eeschema: improve annotation dialog checkbox labeling * Change 'Silent mode' -> 'Always ask for confirmation'. Default on (Same behavior as before, though arguably, it is very annoying and should pr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #421

Chris, Would you please take a look at this when you get a chance? Thanks, Wayne On 6/21/2015 7:51 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [Wayne Stambaugh] Eeschema: component library rescue improvements. > > * Fix

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: remove intermediate modal message in creating NET file that needs annotation first

Henner, This patch fails to apply cleanly against your better-annotation-dialog-checkbox-messaging.diff patch. Wayne On 6/20/2015 6:57 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: > Hi, > When writing a NET file, eeschema notices if not everything is > annotated, so sends the user to annotate the schematic. > > Ho

Re: [Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #421

Oh look, another stupid mistake. **hands in C++ card** I'll get a patch in soon, working on fixing another bug right now. I see the problem. -- Chris On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:35:35PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Chris, > > Would you please take a look at this when you get a chance? > > T

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: remove intermediate modal message in creating NET file that needs annotation first

On 22 June 2015 at 09:39, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Henner, > > This patch fails to apply cleanly against your > better-annotation-dialog-checkbox-messaging.diff patch. I think it conflicted with the "library rescue improvements" patch as there were changes in the vicinity. Updated the patch. Can

[Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #423

See Changes: [jean-pierre charras] Dialog exchange modules: add a fp selection from the fp viewer Fix also an issue on Windows, when using the footprint viewer or the component viewer in modal mode: Reason: these frames (when run

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski > wrote: > > Hi, > > One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward > annotation process. The attached patch set attempts to improve this by > adding an "Update PCB From schematics" option in eeschema when Kicad is > open in

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward >> annotation process. The attached patch set attempts to improve this by >> adding an "Update PCB From schema

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: better annotation dialog checkbox messaging

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Henner Zeller wrote: > > On 22 June 2015 at 08:42, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 6/20/2015 4:38 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: >>> Hi, >>> The checkbox labels in the annotation dialog are hard to understand >>> because they are passive voice and not very clear (What does

Re: [Kicad-developers] idea for post-release file manipulations

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Johannes Maibaum wrote: > > Hey OSX devs, > > And I just came across another minor UI glitch in pcbnew: When running the > DRC, the dialog > window loses focus to the main window after the checks are finished. Since > the main window is > usually bigger than the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >> >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward >>> annotation process. The attached pa

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: better annotation dialog checkbox messaging

On 6/22/2015 1:51 PM, Andy Peters wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Henner Zeller wrote: >> >> On 22 June 2015 at 08:42, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> On 6/20/2015 4:38 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: Hi, The checkbox labels in the annotation dialog are hard to understand because the

Re: [Kicad-developers] OS X issues...

2015-06-22 19:54 GMT+02:00 Andy Peters : > >> On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Johannes Maibaum wrote: >> >> Hey OSX devs, >> >> And I just came across another minor UI glitch in pcbnew: When running the >> DRC, the dialog >> window loses focus to the main window after the checks are finished. Since

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On 6/22/2015 1:55 PM, Andy Peters wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> >> On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: Hi, One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PC

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix build error from 5803

Found the problem in the rescue update - left a couple unused variable declarations behind, which were no longer valid. Not sure why clang was okay with them, it shouldn't have been. -- Chris ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Po

[Kicad-developers] Build failed in Jenkins: kicad-noscript-fedora20 #424

See -- [...truncated 24722 lines...] : In instantiation of ‘void boost::checked_delete(T*) [with T

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix build error from 5803

Uh, oops. Apparently I can't export a patch. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:13:40PM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Found the problem in the rescue update - left a couple unused variable > declarations behind, which were no longer valid. Not sure why clang was > okay with them, it shouldn't have been.

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix build error from 5803

Oh, wow. God, I'm a bloody idiot. Third time's the charm? On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:13:40PM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Found the problem in the rescue update - left a couple unused variable > declarations behind, which were no longer valid. Not sure why clang was > okay with them, it shoul

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: remove intermediate modal message in creating NET file that needs annotation first

On 6/22/2015 1:05 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: > On 22 June 2015 at 09:39, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> Henner, >> >> This patch fails to apply cleanly against your >> better-annotation-dialog-checkbox-messaging.diff patch. > > I think it conflicted with the "library rescue improvements" patch as > the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > On 6/22/2015 1:55 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >> >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> >>> On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: > On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski > wrote: > >>>

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix build error from 5803

Le 22/06/2015 20:17, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > Oh, wow. God, I'm a bloody idiot. > > Third time's the charm? > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:13:40PM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: >> Found the problem in the rescue update - left a couple unused variable >> declarations behind, which were no longe

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On 6/22/2015 2:34 PM, Garth Corral wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Wayne Stambaugh > > wrote: >> >> On 6/22/2015 1:55 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Wayne Stambaugh >>> > wrote: On 6/22/201

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix build error from 5803

Nice, I was just about to submit a second patch to fix that destructor. :) On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:36:12PM +0200, jp charras wrote: > Le 22/06/2015 20:17, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > > Oh, wow. God, I'm a bloody idiot. > > > > Third time's the charm? > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:13:

[Kicad-developers] Jenkins build is back to normal : kicad-noscript-fedora20 #425

See ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https:

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: remove intermediate modal message in creating NET file that needs annotation first

On 22 June 2015 at 11:25, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > On 6/22/2015 1:05 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: >> On 22 June 2015 at 09:39, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> Henner, >>> >>> This patch fails to apply cleanly against your >>> better-annotation-dialog-checkbox-messaging.diff patch. >> >> I think it confl

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On 22.06.2015 19:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >> >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward >>> annotation process. The attached patch set attempts to

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

2015-06-22 22:24 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Wlostowski : > On 22.06.2015 19:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: Hi, One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) was the PCB forward >

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Remove backtracking wires in eeschema

If you place a wire segment and then backtrack over it, you end up with a broken wire in the end: http://misc.c4757p.com/backtrack.mp4 This is because the two segments are merged together, rather than the second *subtracting* from the first, even though the latter case is the way it's shown as

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Indeed there are some hilarious people/trolls in there, it is both fun > at sad to see how some people is not knowing anything about something, > but still persists to say that that something is crap, when 95% of > their points are invald.

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Remove backtracking wires in eeschema

I orginally pinged Chris about this bug and he friendly took up the task. Thumbs up. I have applied the patch and it fixes the issue. On a side note: There was once upon a time that one could draw backwards on a wire to delete it, but one can't do that anymore. (But I think that has been impossi

[Kicad-developers] Mouse offset block pcbnew regression?

Hi folks, I have been wrapping up a board over the last few days, and have been using both the Linux and OS X builds (I had switched to OS X almost exclusively about a year ago, only using the Linux build again this weekend.) I have been having some problems when moving blocks in pcbnew, and I'm

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update the PCB from schematics in one click

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski > wrote: > > On 22.06.2015 19:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 6/22/2015 1:45 PM, Andy Peters wrote: >>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: Hi, One of the biggest annoyances of Kicad (to me) w

[Kicad-developers] Layer order in print setup

Hi all, Technical layers in print preview are displayed in pairs, with the Bottom coming before the Front. It is the reverse for copper layers. See screenshot. It bothered me when selecting the matching silkscreen for a copper layer, and I think other scenarios can be confusing. As I figure we ar

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Under certain (but not all) conditions, kicad applications segfault on quit. This has been reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1431028 https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1467221 It appears to be the case that Pgm().OnPgmExit() was called in the wrong place. This patch moves it fr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Include open source boards as demo projects?

On 6/22/2015 9:33 AM, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > Hi, > > My opinions / ideas about this: > I prefer that non-source code stuff could move out from the source code > repository. > Unless it is for example a test data (test board) to validate and test the > development. > I see right now the demos/ fo

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Is this in addition to or instead of your previous patch that removed destroy() from ~PGM_BASE()? On 6/22/2015 7:04 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Under certain (but not all) conditions, kicad applications segfault on > quit. This has been reported: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1431028

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Addition. I still haven't tracked down the root cause of the other one, but this is unrelated. On Jun 22, 2015 19:41, "Wayne Stambaugh" wrote: > Is this in addition to or instead of your previous patch that removed > destroy() from ~PGM_BASE()? > > On 6/22/2015 7:04 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > U

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Actually this might also fix the other one too, don't know. But it won't hurt to have both, so you might as well commit them for now. I'll finish investigating the other one later tonight or tomorrow. On Jun 22, 2015 19:43, "Chris Pavlina" wrote: > Addition. I still haven't tracked down the root

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Nope, looks like both patches are necessary. I'll investigate the first one further tonight, as that's just a workaround, but the second is definitely a fix. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:41:24PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Is this in addition to or instead of your previous patch that removed >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix segfault on quit

Wayne, commit this one instead of the destroy() patch - found the problem. Also commit the second one, that's a separate (but similar) problem. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:41:24PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Is this in addition to or instead of your previous patch that removed > destroy() fr

Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: remove intermediate modal message in creating NET file that needs annotation first

On 22 June 2015 at 11:25, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > On 6/22/2015 1:05 PM, Henner Zeller wrote: >> On 22 June 2015 at 09:39, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> Henner, >>> >>> This patch fails to apply cleanly against your >>> better-annotation-dialog-checkbox-messaging.diff patch. >> >> I think it confl

Re: [Kicad-developers] Layer order in print setup

I never noticed, because I never use the print dialog. But I will just let you know that there is similar ordering in the plot dialog, except that they are in one coloumn. 2015-06-23 0:53 GMT+02:00 Martin d'Allens : > Hi all, > > Technical layers in print preview are displayed in pairs, with the B