Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Travis Ayres
Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old? On Oct 11, 2015 9:21 AM, "Lorenzo Marcantonio" wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:41:57AM -0400, Stefano Rossi wrote: > > I am a current

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:08:58AM -0700, Travis Ayres wrote: > Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect > things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old? Given that there are however a lot of these machines around, the original topic was about a laptop

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 12.10.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Travis Ayres: > Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect > things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old? The most unreasonable thing I see in this discussion is the try to excuse code sloppiness with hardware age

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote: >> 2) the only mention to this is here: >> >> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks > > There is also: http://kicad-pcb.org/post/known-system-related-issues/ > Perhaps it could be

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Maciej Sumiński
On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote: > 2) the only mention to this is here: > > http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks There is also: http://kicad-pcb.org/post/known-system-related-issues/ Perhaps it could be moved to a permanent page (Help->Known issues or something

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 10/12/2015 10:20 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > But this does not address the issue of KiCad trying to download, patch > and build boost 1.54 if you just do cmake parth/to/srcdir; make. The KICAD_SKIP_BOOST option is documented:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > > On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote: >>> 2) the only mention to this is here: >>> >>> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks >> >> There is also:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 10/12/2015 10:07 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : >> >> On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >>> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote: 2) the only mention to this is here:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
But this does not address the issue of KiCad trying to download, patch and build boost 1.54 if you just do cmake parth/to/srcdir; make. 2015-10-12 16:16 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > > > On 10/12/2015 10:07 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >> 2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne

[Kicad-developers] Regression & performance testing

2015-10-12 Thread Markus Hitter
As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally break something else. Is there a recommended / required procedure? The other question is, what is the recommended procedure to roughly measure graphics

Re: [Kicad-developers] Found the source of Intel GPU suckitude in OpenGL

2015-10-12 Thread Mark Roszko
http://kicad-pcb.org/help/known-system-related-issues/ On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote: >> 2) the only mention to this is here: >> >> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks > > There

Re: [Kicad-developers] Regression & performance testing

2015-10-12 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 12.10.2015 19:47, Markus Hitter wrote: > > As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the > testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally > break something else. Is there a recommended / required procedure? > Hi Markus, There's not much progress on

Re: [Kicad-developers] Regression & performance testing

2015-10-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
2015-10-12 23:50 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Wlostowski : > On 12.10.2015 19:47, Markus Hitter wrote: >> >> As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the >> testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally >> break something else. Is there a