Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect
things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old?
On Oct 11, 2015 9:21 AM, "Lorenzo Marcantonio"
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:41:57AM -0400, Stefano Rossi wrote:
> > I am a current
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:08:58AM -0700, Travis Ayres wrote:
> Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect
> things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old?
Given that there are however a lot of these machines around, the
original topic was about a laptop
Am 12.10.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Travis Ayres:
> Win2k - that was almost 16 years ago. Isn't it unreasonable to expect
> things to work quickly across systems that are *that* old?
The most unreasonable thing I see in this discussion is the try to
excuse code sloppiness with hardware age
On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>> 2) the only mention to this is here:
>>
>> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks
>
> There is also: http://kicad-pcb.org/post/known-system-related-issues/
> Perhaps it could be
On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> 2) the only mention to this is here:
>
> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks
There is also: http://kicad-pcb.org/post/known-system-related-issues/
Perhaps it could be moved to a permanent page (Help->Known issues or
something
On 10/12/2015 10:20 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> But this does not address the issue of KiCad trying to download, patch
> and build boost 1.54 if you just do cmake parth/to/srcdir; make.
The KICAD_SKIP_BOOST option is documented:
2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
>
> On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
>> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>>> 2) the only mention to this is here:
>>>
>>> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks
>>
>> There is also:
On 10/12/2015 10:07 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> 2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
>>
>> On 10/12/2015 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
2) the only mention to this is here:
But this does not address the issue of KiCad trying to download, patch
and build boost 1.54 if you just do cmake parth/to/srcdir; make.
2015-10-12 16:16 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
>
>
> On 10/12/2015 10:07 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> 2015-10-12 15:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne
As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the
testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally
break something else. Is there a recommended / required procedure?
The other question is, what is the recommended procedure to roughly
measure graphics
http://kicad-pcb.org/help/known-system-related-issues/
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Maciej Sumiński
wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 03:37 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>> 2) the only mention to this is here:
>>
>> http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/en/pcbnew.html#_general_remarks
>
> There
On 12.10.2015 19:47, Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the
> testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally
> break something else. Is there a recommended / required procedure?
>
Hi Markus,
There's not much progress on
2015-10-12 23:50 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
> On 12.10.2015 19:47, Markus Hitter wrote:
>>
>> As I'm shortly before providing my first commit I wonder what the
>> testing procedures are to make sure a patch doesn't unintentionally
>> break something else. Is there a
13 matches
Mail list logo