Re: [Kicad-developers] Turning Off printf("H-net %d\n", aHead.Net()) ?

On 03.11.2015 15:30, Joseph Chen wrote: > I recently started seeing lots of lines of printed texts on the terminal > where kicad is started in Linux, and a quick grep shows the following > line does the printouts: > > pcbnew/router/pns_line_placer.cpp:1046:printf("H-net %d\n", > aHead.Net());

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

The Paltatech boards were the closest ones to "commerical" but they have had the linked added. http://www.paltatech.com/eiti/ http://www.paltatech.com/electrosmart/ On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > I'm OK with this. I don't know if we even have any

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

This is exactly what I am looking for. It doesn't need to be a big production, just a link to our website. On 11/3/2015 10:08 AM, Mark Roszko wrote: > The Paltatech boards were the closest ones to "commerical" but they > have had the linked added. > http://www.paltatech.com/eiti/ >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > I know it's noisy but I want developer input on this as well as website > developer input. I think the developers have a right to know how their > work is being used and have a say in it. The CERN folks may want some

[Kicad-developers] Has any one put up the source of kicad in lxr web format like the linux kernel ?

Hi, I was looking at the source code, and my old brain need's some real help with all the endless includes.. etc I was wondering if any one had put up the source code using Lxr, like http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ if not how much interested would here be from other developers.. ? I was thinking

[Kicad-developers] kicad-install.sh enhancements test release for comments.

Hi, the current version of the Linux/debian/RedHad install script has some short comings which I'm attempting to to fix, I have put up a test version with enhancements at http://www.cosmosc.com/kicad/ for developers to try out and give me feed back. It's only be tested on Debian, as I don't have

Re: [Kicad-developers] RC2 blockers?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Yes. The P router still has a serious segfault issue. I've talked to > Tom about it and he is working on it. As soon as the fixes are > committed, I will be rolling out rc2. I'm hoping it will be soon. Last time

[Kicad-developers] Patch eagle_plugin.cpp Eagle layers import 95 & 96 bug

The Bug:layers 95 and 96 don't exist in Eagle PCB there only in sch. The source incorrectly show's layers from 91 to 98 as being pcb layers there not. Only sch layers. In Eagle you can not crate layers 95 and 96 you just get a error. Only layers 100 and

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad-install.sh enhancements test release for comments.

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:03:03PM +0200, Lachlan Audas wrote: > PS: I can't get the doc's to build, the current URL for doc's for bzr > is out of date.. or damage.. or ? > Has any one the correct one for the docs? Old bzr docs are disabled as for new docs are now in the github repo:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Patch eagle_plugin.cpp Eagle layers import 95 & 96 bug

Sorry did not finish the post so continue.. Here are to patch's first one reassign import layers 95 and 96 to 160 and 161, and remove's the comments about layers 91-98 being Eagle PCB layers. I prefer this one, as my eagle to kicad conversion scrip can document change I have made on those

[Kicad-developers] Bug #1511552 - Fixes to Incorrect export of Spice net-list from EESchema

Hello, I reported the bug #1511552 and suggested to provide a patch. I'd like to hear your suggestions and objections to what I was to going to do. In short (details in the bug report): In EESchema, it is hard to create a schema that can be used simultaneously for Spice simulations and Pcb

[Kicad-developers] translated layer mess

So it turns out all the demo files in KiCad are also affected by the translated layer name mess. They all more or less have the french layer names. So none of them load as of bzr 6292 in pcbnew. So ignoring that issue for a moment, is there any reason why we cannot add a more friendly error

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

"Proprietary" does sound better for the cases people are not particularly selling but rather showcasing ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > That is good news. Olimex precedes Arduino and the boom of opensource > hardware we are at moment. I remember long years ago that Olimex was already > a reference in embedded systems with their development boards. > It

[Kicad-developers] invoking IDF export from inside pcbnew python console

Hi Cirilo and all, is there a way to invoke / export the pcb board to IDF from a python command in pcbnew python kicad console? I went through pcbnew.py file but it seems to me there is no command to do it with the pcbnew python APIs... Maurice

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

Hi, Olimex did already some small boards / interfaces in kicad (probably to test the new version) https://github.com/OLIMEX/BB-CH340T/raw/master/bb-ch340t.kicad_pcb https://github.com/OLIMEX/MOD-MPU9150/raw/master/HARDWARE/MOD-MPU9150-Rev.A/mod-mpu9150.kicad_pcb

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

"Olimex is paving the way with their migration from Eagle to KiCad. Hopefully the Arduinos, Adrafruits and Sparkfuns of the world will one day choose to use KiCad too." That is good news. Olimex precedes Arduino and the boom of opensource hardware we are at moment. I remember long years ago

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

I found the issue, this packages are missing in the instructions: pacman -S mingw-w64-i686-toolchain pacman -S make Mario From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Mário Luzeiro [mrluze...@ua.pt]

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

>> http://ci.kicad-pcb.org/job/kicad-doxygen/ws/Documentation/doxygen/html/md_Documentation_development_compiling.html#build_windows. Hi all, I am following the build kicad instruction on windows for the first time but cmake is failing. Is something missing in the instructions? Help! Thanks

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

I don't have the prompt right here, but maybe there must not be a space between the G and the "MSYS... 2015-11-03 23:28 GMT+01:00 Mário Luzeiro : >>> http://ci.kicad-pcb.org/job/kicad-doxygen/ws/Documentation/doxygen/html/md_Documentation_development_compiling.html#build_windows.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

Someone please add these boards to the made with kicad when you get a chance. Thanks, Wayne On 11/3/2015 2:35 PM, easyw wrote: > Hi, > > Olimex did already some small boards / interfaces in kicad (probably to > test the new version) > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] eeschema cleanup of unused vars and imports and type casts

Patch committed in the product branch r6296. Thank you for your contribution to KiCad. Cheers, Wayne On 11/3/2015 12:21 AM, Mark Roszko wrote: > Quick pass. Removed a little dead includes, unused variables and some > type casts. No functional or anything changes. Manually performed. > > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

Still need help on this: Now it failed to link in the end: $ make [ 29%] Built target bitmaps [ 29%] Built target page_layout_lexer_source_files [ 29%] Built target boost [ 29%] Built target lib-dependencies [ 29%] Generating version string header -- Using Bazaar to determine build version

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

You installed the i686 toolchain, not the x86_64 toolchain which is required for 64 bit builds as well as the appropriate x86_64 libraries. You told cmake to point to /mingw64 which is the 64 bit mingw path. Did you run the correct bat file for 64 bit builds? If you are trying to build a 64 bit

[Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation, documentation, organisation, usability and documentation (Was: Re: Bug #1511552 - Fixes to Incorrect export of Spice net-list from EESchema)

Hello I'm just a lurker and still not started to contribute, but I have some ideas: - Indian Institute of Technology Bombay: I see technological and educational institutions as potential contributors at this stage of development. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay developed the Oscad package

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] pcbnew 2 bug fix, clean pointless casts, remove unused vars

1. Fixed copy paste error in append_board_to_current.cpp ruining a if else condition, should fix a possible bounding box computation bug 2. Whole bunch of pointless casts removed 3. Unused variables removed 4. Fix bug caused by JP on April 25, 2015 where strings were adjusted for translation and

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

I'm OK with this. I don't know if we even have any commercial boards on our made with KiCad page. I'm really not trying to stir up controversy here. I merely want to protect the best interests of the project. Wayne On 11/3/2015 9:36 AM, Adam Wolf wrote: > It might be easier to agree on a

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

AFAIK, kicadwinbuilder is no longer being maintained. The preferred method for building kicad on windows is to us the new msys2/mingw32/64 environment. See http://ci.kicad-pcb.org/job/kicad-doxygen/ws/Documentation/doxygen/html/md_Documentation_development_compiling.html#build_windows. Please

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

? This one is maintained: https://github.com/nickoe/KiCad-Winbuilder That automates the whole process with msys2. The PKGBUILD is probably better than what msys2 has in its own system because we actually package libxslt! and disable the gcc 5.1,5.2 warning spam bug. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:36

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

It might be easier to agree on a policy for projects where they provide KiCad design files, and figure out the policy for ones where they don't later. Cut the problem in half, and tackle the easy one :) Adam Wolf Cofounder and Engineer Wayne and Layne On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Wayne

Re: [Kicad-developers] RC2 blockers?

On 11/3/2015 5:34 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 03.11.2015 20:13, Javier Serrano wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Wayne Stambaugh >> wrote: >>> Yes. The P router still has a serious segfault issue. I've talked to >>> Tom about it and he is working on it.

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

Yaps, Nick told me to try this new one. Sorry I was outdated :/ I will try latter... From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Wayne Stambaugh [stambau...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 November 2015 13:36 To:

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad-install.sh enhancements test release for comments.

Hi Lachlan, I seem to remember that kicad-install.sh will not be maintained as part of KiCad going forward--perhaps you're a great future maintainer :) Docs are now in https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-doc. Adam Wolf On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Lachlan Audas wrote: > Hi,

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad-install.sh enhancements test release for comments.

Adam is correct. This script has been way more trouble than it's worth so I'm not interested in maintaining it. Feel free to use it at your own risk. The legacy doc repo has been renamed to https://code.launchpad.net/~stambaughw/kicad/doc-read-only. That's why the doc build is failing. This

Re: [Kicad-developers] linux gcc vs windows mingw issues

Le 03/11/2015 15:02, Mark Roszko a écrit : > ? > This one is maintained: > https://github.com/nickoe/KiCad-Winbuilder > > That automates the whole process with msys2. The PKGBUILD is probably > better than what msys2 has in its own system because we actually > package libxslt! and disable the gcc

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

On 11/3/2015 5:09 AM, Javier Serrano wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> I know it's noisy but I want developer input on this as well as website >> developer input. I think the developers have a right to know how their >> work is being used

Re: [Kicad-developers] RC2 blockers?

On 03.11.2015 20:13, Javier Serrano wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> Yes. The P router still has a serious segfault issue. I've talked to >> Tom about it and he is working on it. As soon as the fixes are >> committed, I will be rolling

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

Hi all, I cannot comment much about the policies and decisions. I believe they are a delicate subject. But as a contributor and "word spread" of kicad, I like to know and see my work being used. That is the only way I feel I received my "payment". I will be happy to know about open license

Re: [Kicad-developers] Looking for complex board designs

While we're at this, Olimex is working on a nice board using KiCad: https://olimex.wordpress.com/2015/10/16/we-work-on-a64-olinuxino-the-first-open-source-hardware-64-bit-development-board/ https://olimex.wordpress.com/2015/10/23/a64-olinuxino-update/ Which allows me to repeat my mantra :) The

Re: [Kicad-developers] translated layer mess

On 11/3/2015 10:47 AM, Mark Roszko wrote: > So it turns out all the demo files in KiCad are also affected by the > translated layer name mess. Huh? I just checked. All of the kicad demo boards open just fine for me. Remember, copper layers can be translated because they have fixed ordinal

Re: [Kicad-developers] translated layer mess

Actually I just noticed I had a old kicad vs new kicad conflict on this machine. So my bad on that. But the nicer error message point still a concern as I've seen other users asking about it recently. I am just not sure the best way to word the message/dictate. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:37 AM,