You do realize we've already argued over pretty much all the points you
made, and _finished_ the patch already?
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 01:17:07PM +0800, David Godfrey wrote:
>Wow, 2 posts from me in the same day!
>That is unprecedented ;-)
>
>Comments inline.
>
>On 19/12/15
Wow, 2 posts from me in the same day!
That is unprecedented ;-)
Comments inline.
On 19/12/15 04:56, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
On 12/18/2015 2:22 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Thanks, and I don't mean to sound grouchy about it. I don
Hi Piers,
On 20/12/15 00:24, Piers Titus van der Torren wrote:
Hi Wayne,
If I can add my thoughts, I think Steven has a fair point that
tracking zones in the DRC is non trivial, so a 'real' solution in that
direction is not around the corner, and will never be perfect either.
Yes, I think ther
Hi,
I don't often post here, but I will add my ~30 years of experience
with binary file formats.
THEY ARE EVIL EVIL THINGS !!
They tend to be extremely fragile, any change and something is
likely to break.
They require parsers that suck to mainta
On 19 December 2015 at 16:32, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> I'm fine with this one, and it all works quite well so I'm assuming Henner
> considers it final. I'd commit it.
Yes, considered final, ready to submit.
(And yes, sorry if I screwed up code styles, I try to be more careful.
Too many projects wi
I'm fine with this one, and it all works quite well so I'm assuming Henner
considers it final. I'd commit it.
On Dec 19, 2015 7:21 PM, "Wayne Stambaugh" wrote:
> On 12/19/2015 2:57 AM, Henner Zeller wrote:
> > On 18 December 2015 at 21:57, Henner Zeller wrote:
> >> On 18 December 2015 at 21:50,
On 12/19/2015 2:57 AM, Henner Zeller wrote:
> On 18 December 2015 at 21:57, Henner Zeller wrote:
>> On 18 December 2015 at 21:50, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:40:29PM -0800, Henner Zeller wrote:
On 18 December 2015 at 21:33, Chris Pavlina
wrote:
> I'm not go
Wayne, any other concerns I need to address to get committed?
On Dec 14, 2015 11:30 PM, "Mark Roszko" wrote:
> Just a new thread. Since Adam has posted in the other thread that it
> works fine on OSX :)
>
> Added the version info the to the "Copy clipboard" and uppercased some
> public vars.
>
__
this is also my point of view ...
thumb up!
On 19/12/2015 17.24, Piers Titus van der Torren wrote:
Hi Wayne,
If I can add my thoughts, I think Steven has a fair point that tracking
zones in the DRC is non trivial, so a 'real' solution in that direction
is not around the corner, and will never be
Agreed. In fact, that's kinda what I had in mind with redoing the options
system a bit. We have a bit of a mess - multiple options, and in the code,
multiple ways of reading and setting them. I'd like to clean that up a bit.
But organizing should come first, I think, because the options dialog is
On Dec 19, 2015 12:04 PM, "Attila Kinali" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:07:28 -0500
> Chris Pavlina wrote:
>
> > Nah, I'd love to, but I can't afford travel right now :(
>
> Doh!
>
> > I like your organization - if Wayne's okay with this, I'll probably go
> > with that, then. I have one comme
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:07:28 -0500
Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Nah, I'd love to, but I can't afford travel right now :(
Doh!
> I like your organization - if Wayne's okay with this, I'll probably go
> with that, then. I have one comment: in the current setup, the major
> categories are tabs, so I'd
On 12/19/2015 10:07 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:55:59AM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote:
>> Moin!
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:12 -0500
>> Chris Pavlina wrote:
>>
>>> Related to my previous mail, as it would add an option or two - Wayne
>>> suggested, and I agree, that the
Hi Wayne,
If I can add my thoughts, I think Steven has a fair point that tracking
zones in the DRC is non trivial, so a 'real' solution in that direction is
not around the corner, and will never be perfect either.
The proposed change has as side effect that unconnected tracks without a
zone connec
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:55:59AM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Moin!
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:12 -0500
> Chris Pavlina wrote:
>
> > Related to my previous mail, as it would add an option or two - Wayne
> > suggested, and I agree, that the eeschema options dialog is getting
> > stuffed.
Since you went to the trouble to actually code this up, I figure I might
as well try it - and I'm okay with this compromise. Still not exactly my
favorite approach, but you made it work fairly well, and it looks useful
enough. *thumbs up*
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:57:37PM -0800, Henner Zeller
2015-12-19 9:31 GMT+01:00 Henner Zeller :
> On 18 December 2015 at 23:07, Cirilo Bernardo
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've gone over the changes in the 3d_initial_merge branch and it looks like
>> it's ready for people to inspect the code and merge with the main branch.
>>
>> At the moment the
Moin!
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:12 -0500
Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Related to my previous mail, as it would add an option or two - Wayne
> suggested, and I agree, that the eeschema options dialog is getting
> stuffed. I suggested that I kind of wanted to rework the options system
> as a whole, b
On 18 December 2015 at 23:07, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've gone over the changes in the 3d_initial_merge branch and it looks like
> it's ready for people to inspect the code and merge with the main branch.
>
> At the moment the legacy 3DViewer is left intact but the Footprint
> Pr
19 matches
Mail list logo
