Le 19/08/2016 à 01:33, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> I just committed the component library file parser for the new schematic
> I/O plugin manager. Please test it when you get a chance. As with the
> schematic parser and formatter, it requires compiling with
> -DUSE_SCH_IO_MANAGER=ON. The current
It will make the library line ordering more consistent since the
libraries will be sorted on load instead on only when modified. The
first save of the library will be ugly, but after that it should be much
better for VCS users.
On 8/18/2016 8:28 PM, Simon Wells wrote:
> Hey Wayne,
>
> Will this
Oops! Good catch.
On 8/18/2016 9:35 PM, Simon Wells wrote:
> FYI
>
> /Users/simon/Documents/kicad-app/kicad/eeschema/sch_legacy_plugin.cpp:2171:5:
> error:
>
> void function 'loadHeader' should not return a value [-Wreturn-type]
>
> wxCHECK( strCompare( "$HEADER", line, &line ), NULL
Since I haven't got any feedback, I'm going to tag release 4.0.4
sometime today unless someone has any issues. I will create the source
archive and make the release announcement on Sunday.
On 8/16/2016 6:58 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I'm going to have to roll out 4.0.4 sooner than I wanted to t
Le 19/08/2016 à 16:02, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> Since I haven't got any feedback, I'm going to tag release 4.0.4
> sometime today unless someone has any issues. I will create the source
> archive and make the release announcement on Sunday.
the Bug #1614691 needs to be fixed for 4.04 because i
On 8/19/2016 10:24 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 19/08/2016 à 16:02, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> Since I haven't got any feedback, I'm going to tag release 4.0.4
>> sometime today unless someone has any issues. I will create the source
>> archive and make the release announcement on Sunday.
>
> the
I posted the Bug #1614821, should it be fixed too?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> On 8/19/2016 10:24 AM, jp charras wrote:
> > Le 19/08/2016 à 16:02, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> >> Since I haven't got any feedback, I'm going to tag release 4.0.4
> >> sometime today un
Hi Bruno,
It is a duplicate of #1606332 and it is already fixed in both stable &
product branches.
Regards,
Orson
On 08/19/2016 04:44 PM, Bruno Andrade wrote:
> I posted the Bug #1614821, should it be fixed too?
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/19/2016
Hi Orson!
I didn't find it when searching, my fault! Sorry
Regards,
Bruno
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Maciej Sumiński
wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> It is a duplicate of #1606332 and it is already fixed in both stable &
> product branches.
>
> Regards,
> Orson
>
> On 08/19/2016 04:44 PM, Bruno A
This morning's PNS happy fun time:
https://misc.c4757p.com/track_hugging.mp4
Why is it so hard to get PNS to "hug" a trace like that? It seems to
have trouble going around corners - it "snaps in" if I come up on an
edge, but going around a corner it insists on sticking to the grid...
___
Uh, nice job with the subject line there. Sorry. Typed my mail recipient
alias twice.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:46:44PM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> This morning's PNS happy fun time:
>
> https://misc.c4757p.com/track_hugging.mp4
>
> Why is it so hard to get PNS to "hug" a trace like that? It
Hello.
Since when does that happens?
I see tons of wrong behavior on Push & Shove routing on PCB editors of other
EDA packages (such as CadSoft Eagle, for example). I strongly believe to be
taken as _what_not_to_do examples.
I think any kind of these issues in a user available feature are i
Hello.
Since when does that happens?
I see tons of wrong behavior on Push & Shove routing on PCB editors of other
EDA packages (such as CadSoft Eagle, for example). I strongly believe to be
taken as _what_not_to_do examples.
I think any kind of these issues in a user available feature are i
I have had this same problem a couple of times, but almost "automatically"
I pressed F9 and routed it manually. I'll try to reproduce it this weekend
as I have 2 simple boards to route.
And I never used any other EDA packages.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Timofonic wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Since
Hello.
Since when does that PnS issue happens?
I see tons of wrong behavior on Push & Shove routing on PCB editors of other
EDA packages and CadSoft Eagle, for example). I strongly believe to be taken
as _what_not_to_do examples. I think any kind of these issues iare irrational
and totally
lolwut
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:35:02PM +0200, Timofonic wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Since when does that PnS issue happens?
>
> I see tons of wrong behavior on Push & Shove routing on PCB editors of other
> EDA packages and CadSoft Eagle, for example). I strongly believe to be taken
> as _what_n
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>
> This morning's PNS happy fun time:
>
> https://misc.c4757p.com/track_hugging.mp4
>
> Why is it so hard to get PNS to "hug" a trace like that? It seems to
> have trouble going around corners - it "snaps in" if I come up on an
> edge, but g
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 12:39 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>
> lolwut
Exactly.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:35:02PM +0200, Timofonic wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Since when does that PnS issue happens?
>>
>> I see tons of wrong behavior on Push & Shove routing on PCB editors of other
>> EDA packa
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:32:46PM -0700, Andy Peters wrote:
>
> > On Aug 19, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> >
> > This morning's PNS happy fun time:
> >
> > https://misc.c4757p.com/track_hugging.mp4
> >
> > Why is it so hard to get PNS to "hug" a trace like that? It seems to
> > hav
19 matches
Mail list logo
