I'm making more noise again.
Have all options been explored?
Sparse Checkout + clone depth = 1
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/180052/checkout-subdirectories-in-git
Using different branches to differentiate content in git. Seems weird...
but why not?
Jon,
Using the SVN functionality of GitHub it's possible to do the following:
a) Partial checkout (individual libraries as required)
b) Checkout latest master
c) Checkout tagged releases (e.g. 4.0.7)
It would be "simple" to implement this using Python using the svn bindings.
Would this be a
As a user, I always move to the edge of my seat when this conversation
comes up. I sit there, waiting for awesome new features like in-program
diff and pull requesting for kicad libraries, and then I inevitably sit
back down because (IMHO) kicad wanted to use the github api and start
wget vs.
pcb_painter.cpp:1085
void PCB_PAINTER::draw( const ZONE_CONTAINER* aZone )
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Oliver Walters <
oliver.henry.walt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking for where ZONE_CONTAINER is drawn in GAL? In legacy it is
> handled in class_zone.cpp but I can't find where it's
I'm looking for where ZONE_CONTAINER is drawn in GAL? In legacy it is
handled in class_zone.cpp but I can't find where it's being drawn under
Cairo / OpenGL
Anyone have info on this?
Thanks,
Oliver
___
Mailing list:
Hi Adam,
Yes, on Linux one has to choose between Nightly/Stable if using the
PPA. The other option is building KiCad yourself, which I can do, but
many can't/won't. I was not sure of the situation on other OS's if you
can install Nightly/Stable simultaneously on Mac, then its more reason
Hi Orson,
Can, and will, thanks for the feedback. Ditto for the DRC situation I
described.
Steven
On 21/09/17 18:09, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
Hi Steven,
The via tool is still quite fresh, so as you have noticed - it might be
lacking in certain cases. Would you please turn it into a bug
Hi Orson,
I have dug into Seth's report of slowness on this large Gerber file, and
reproduced it.
It looks like VIEW is struggling under the load of all the items, so this
is a generic GAL problem, but Gerber files in general have many more draw
items than PCB files, so we only notice it now.
I
Strontium,
I assume you are talking about linux based on the word PPA, but mostly
for other people on the list, you can do this with the MacOS KiCad.
Adam
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Strontium wrote:
> This is a question for the distribution maintainers,
>
> Is it
This is a question for the distribution maintainers,
Is it possible to change the distribution PPA's (etc) so that one can
install the nightly and the stable version of kicad, simultaneously?
When things like file format versions change then people have to make a
choice, do I run nightly and
I think it would make the most sense to do option (a), possibly also
leaving open the possibility of changing the updates source location (for
example, it's conceivable to have a mirror server at kicad-pcb.org that
contains snapshots of the libraries that are compiled from the Git repo
whenever
Hi all,
Ok, now that the website integration with the libraries is (pretty much)
done, and the licensing issue seems to be sorted, there is one final puzzle
piece to solve before I'm happy with the state of the libraries for a v5
release.
*Goal: *Merge all footprint library repositories into a
I feel the via filling option in the job spec is too limited At my company
we probably have a few hundred boards where we do via fills depending on
their diameter. We keep their usage the same based on diameter, i.e. 8 mil
vias go in pads, 6 mil vias are used in impedance controlled traces.And I
Hi Jon-
Sorry, my wording was bad. This is not a merging show-stopper. Legacy use
is unaffected.
Best-
Seth
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> Thanks for reporting and providing your example file. I will investigate
> this issue, but is
Hi Seth,
Thanks for reporting and providing your example file. I will investigate
this issue, but is this actually a show stopper for merging? Can't you
just keep using legacy canvas?
Thanks,
Jon
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Seth Hillbrand
wrote:
> -- Apologies
Hi,
On 21.09.2017 14:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> We can start experimenting with it but until it's been packaged for
> stable release on all major platforms, I don't want to make a dependency
> for KiCad.
My question was more like "people will ask whether it works, has anyone
actually
We can start experimenting with it but until it's been packaged for
stable release on all major platforms, I don't want to make a dependency
for KiCad.
On 9/20/2017 5:59 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> I mostly us the Phoenix documentation and it seems close, but not exact.
> There also have been
The problem I see is how do we ensure that the original intent of the
Eagle design is preserved when it's imported into KiCad. We can import
graphical items to copper but should they be imported as graphical items
or converted to custom pads. Is there any way to tell the difference in
Eagle? If
Well put, Wayne and Orson.
@Nox, I agree with you that it's better to have the user drive instead
of automagic that may cause more confusion than help.
On 22/09/17 00:00, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I second Orson's comments. Our nightly users deserve our gratitude for
testing and filing bug
Orson,
I'm leaving this decision up to you and JP since I have not had time to
test it. JP, do you have any other concerns about this?
Thanks,
Wayne
On 9/21/2017 6:05 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Thanks you, this is really cool! Now it is even more tempting to merge
> the
I second Orson's comments. Our nightly users deserve our gratitude for
testing and filing bug reports. Thank you.
I wish we had the manpower to support multiple file versions but it's a
feature that has a very high cost for very little net gain. I realize
it's a less than ideal situation but
I ask for a bug report here as well. We plan to improve DRC, but it is
not the right moment to do so, as we need to focus to finish the last
features for v5 and switch to the feature freeze stage.
Regards,
Orson
On 09/13/2017 06:04 AM, Strontium wrote:
> His third criticism is with net
Hi Steven,
The via tool is still quite fresh, so as you have noticed - it might be
lacking in certain cases. Would you please turn it into a bug report?
Your message is already drowning in the mailing list traffic, but a bug
report will stay in the tracker until it is resolved.
Regards,
Orson
Hi Jon,
Thanks you, this is really cool! Now it is even more tempting to merge
the gerbview_gal branch. I am going to wait one more day for vetos and
tomorrow I will push it to the master branch.
Regards,
Orson
On 09/20/2017 09:57 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi Orson,
>
> Give this a shot in your
Hi Jon,
I think it makes sense to enable the save button, as the board state has
changed. I have just pushed your patch, thank you!
Regards,
Orson
On 09/14/2017 04:24 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a partial fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/793420 --
> addresses the issue
Hi hauptmech,
In the meantime, there is an ongoing work to support custom shape pads,
which also demands a file format version bump (already done, right
before the long pad names patch to avoid too frequent version
increments). Such change calls for another set of if-elses to determine
whether we
Would not "automatic file version switching" result into even stranger
situations? i.e. that users of "newer" kicad version would generate
files which are sometimes compatible and sometimes not without "obvious"
reason? What normally is done is offering users to save as an older
fileversion.
Le 20/09/2017 à 23:56, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> I haven't tried to build it on mingw. I'm guessing if it's anything
> like it's predecessor, it will require some work but I could be wrong.
> Given that the build instructions only mention msvc and say nothing
> about building with mingw on
28 matches
Mail list logo